Fed Up Ben Carson OBLITERATES Ilhan Omar’s Racist Lies – Media PANICS!

.
.

HUD Secretary Ben Carson Obliterates Ilhan Omar’s Racism Claims with Facts, Igniteing Media Firestorm

WASHINGTON, D.C. — A national political firestorm ignited this morning after U.S. Secretary of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Ben Carson forcefully rebutted accusations of racism leveled at President Donald Trump by Congresswoman Ilhan Omar (D-MN). Appearing on national television, Carson used economic data and personal anecdotes to counter Omar’s claim that the President “wants every black brown person deported and Muslims banned,” a dramatic intervention that has led conservative commentators to claim Omar was “destroyed with pure facts” and sent the mainstream media into a “panic.“

The confrontation highlights the deep ideological chasm within American politics, pitting the progressive “Squad” against senior members of the Trump administration over defining the nature of the President’s character and his impact on minority communities.

The Accusation: A Tweet Ignites the Debate

The controversy began with a late-night tweet from Congresswoman Ilhan Omar, a member of the influential far-left “Squad,” who stated:

“You all should end this charade and accept that this racist president wants every black brown person deported and Muslims banned. His immigration policies say this much.”

The tweet was a direct continuation of the highly charged rhetoric surrounding the President’s policies and came shortly before the President himself fired back, tweeting that he did not believe the four progressive Congresswomen were “capable of loving our country” and that they should “apologize to America and Israel for their horrible, hateful things that they’ve said.“

The stage was set for Secretary Carson, a highly respected figure in the African-American community and a retired neurosurgeon, to offer a firsthand perspective on his boss’s alleged racism.

Carson’s Response: Dissecting the “Racist” Claim

During his live interview, Secretary Carson was asked directly: “Is he racist?“

Carson’s answer was an unequivocal defense of President Trump, delivered with what observers described as calm, nononsense conviction.

“He is not racist at all,” Carson affirmed.

The Secretary then proceeded to deploy a two-pronged rebuttal, focusing on both personal character and verifiable policy results.

I. Evidence of Character

Carson offered several personal anecdotes to illustrate the President’s character, contrasting the media narrative with his private experiences:

The Mar-a-Lago Incident: Carson recounted meeting Trump before they entered politics. When a staffer interrupted their conversation to announce a celebrity visitor, Trump dismissed the interruption, saying, “Yeah, but this is Ben Carson.” This, Carson suggested, showed a true sense of personal respect.
The Debate Stand: He recalled an incident during the 2016 Republican primary debates where his name was not announced on stage. While every other candidate “gleefully walked past,” Trump stayed beside Carson until the issue was resolved. Carson emphasized, “That’s the kind of person that he is.“
Historical Support: Carson pointed out that the President had a documented history of support for the African-American community in New York, noting that civil rights leader Jesse Jackson had once given Trump an award for his work.

Carson argued that these personal interactions and historical facts contradict the caricature of Trump often portrayed in the media.

II. Policy Over Rhetoric

Shifting from personal accounts to policy, Carson used quantifiable data to argue that the President’s actions have demonstrably helped, not hurt, the minority communities that Omar claims he is targeting.

Policy Achievement
Impact Cited by Ben Carson

Employment
Black and Hispanic unemployment hit the lowest levels ever recorded.

Opportunity Zones
Created an incentive for people with “unrealized capital gains” to plow them into areas of the country that have traditionally been neglected.

Second Chance Act
Engaged heavily in promoting “second chance” for ex-offenders to help them rebuild their lives.

Xuất sang Trang tính

“Look at the policies that have been done, and look at the people who have been helped,” Carson urged, asserting that it is the results of the administration’s policies—not the subjective “hashing over” of controversial statements in the media—that define the President’s legacy on race.

The Media and the “Radical Element”

When pressed on how an elected official like Congresswoman Omar can make such drastic, unverified claims—that the President seeks to deport “every black and brown person”—Carson offered a harsh assessment of the current political environment.

He warned of a “radical element” that has been introduced into the legislative body, seemingly intent on pushing their ideology. Crucially, Carson argued that this element has an “accomplice in the media” in doing so, which he called “very detrimental to our country.”

Carson criticized the press for failing in its fundamental role, protected by the Constitution: “They were supposed to disseminate objectively to the people of America real information upon which they could make decisions. They were not supposed to try to manipulate people.”

He concluded that this radical element is “taking advantage of the ideological bent of the media,” a situation he hopes the American people are “smart enough to figure out,” echoing the sentiment of Thomas Jefferson.

A Muslim Doctor’s Rebuke of Omar

The broadcast followed Carson’s appearance with an interview featuring Dr. Zuhdi Jasser, an American Muslim doctor and member of the Council on Foreign Relations, who offered his own sharp rebuke of Congresswoman Omar.

Dr. Jasser stated that Omar is “an embarrassment and a disgrace to the Muslim community” and is not the victim she portrays herself to be.

9/11 Denial: The doctor focused heavily on Omar’s past comments appearing to diminish the significance of the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, calling her actions a “profound denial of 9/11.” He compared her rhetoric to the mentality of Holocaust and genocide deniers.
Betrayal of Justice: Dr. Jasser argued that Omar’s actions contradict core Islamic values, noting that the Quran commands Muslims to be “strict in observing justice even if it means bearing witness against ourselves.” He stated that Omar has violated this principle by harboring prejudices and diminishing the worst attack on the country since Pearl Harbor.
Assault on Victims: Jasser, who is a physician to survivors of the World Trade Center attacks, called her rhetoric an “assault on my patients and all families who are grieving” and condemned political opponents who are “shielding her from the kind of searing criticism she deserves.”

Conclusion: A Battle Over Narrative and Truth

The confluence of testimony from a high-ranking African-American official and an American Muslim leader created a powerful counter-narrative to Congresswoman Omar’s race-based political attacks.

For many conservatives, Carson’s defense provided necessary validation for their support of the President, highlighting that economic success and criminal justice reform are tangible actions that overshadow controversial rhetoric. Conversely, the intense focus on Omar’s statements and associations reinforces the conservative view that the “Squad” is composed of radicals who seek to profit from division and harbor a deep-seated antagonism toward American values.

The media’s handling of the dueling perspectives—focusing heavily on Omar’s initial attack but often downplaying the impact of Carson’s fact-based response—only reinforces the administration’s claim that the press operates as a partisan megaphone rather than an objective disseminator of information. The political battle remains one not just of policy, but of narrative and truth itself.

.