‘Holy crap on steroids!’: Top Trump officials exposed in shocking, sloppy military security blunder

“Holy Crap on Steroids!”: Top Trump Officials Exposed in Shocking, Sloppy Military Security Blunder

In an astonishing breach of national security, top officials from the Trump administration accidentally included a journalist in a private military chat, leading to the leak of sensitive war plans involving U.S. military operations. This shocking lapse in security revealed high-level operational details of an impending strike against the Houthi rebels in Yemen, among other sensitive information. The event has raised serious questions about the competence and oversight of senior government officials, especially when it comes to protecting classified data.

The Inadvertent Leak: A Private Group Chat Gone Wrong

The bizarre chain of events began when Jeffrey Goldberg, the Editor-in-Chief of The Atlantic magazine, received a connection request on the encrypted messaging app Signal from an account identified as Michael Waltz, a top Trump national security advisor. Initially, Goldberg assumed this was a legitimate request, likely concerning international affairs, perhaps related to Iran or Ukraine—issues that have long been part of his reporting beat.

However, two days later, Goldberg was added to a Signal group chat labeled “Houthi PC Small Group.” As soon as he entered, Goldberg was stunned to discover that the group chat was not just any typical conversation—it included some of the highest-ranking officials in the Trump administration, including Mike Waltz, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, CIA Director John Ratcliffe, Senator Marco Rubio, and other key figures like Tulsi Gabbard, Stephen Miller, and others. The group chat’s focus was on an upcoming military operation against the Houthi rebels in Yemen, involving specific timing, targets, and operational details.

The text in the group chat read as follows: “Team establishing a principals (misspelled ‘principals’) group for coordination on Houthis, particularly for over the next 72 hours.” This message set off alarm bells for Goldberg, who had no idea why he, as a journalist, was included in such a sensitive chat.

A Breakdown of National Security: Reckless Behavior or Incompetence?

As Goldberg continued to read the messages, the severity of the situation became increasingly apparent. One text from Pete Hegseth, in particular, stood out: “We are currently clean on OPSEC,” referring to Operational Security. However, as Goldberg quickly pointed out, they were not “clean on OPSEC”—they were grossly negligent. Not only had they shared sensitive military plans in a commercially available messaging app, but they had also included an outsider—a journalist—who was not meant to be part of these private discussions.

Goldberg, ever the journalist, found himself in the position of witnessing a breach of national security. Despite the app’s claim to be encrypted, Signal is not intended for the exchange of sensitive, classified military information. The group chat not only contained operational details about military strikes but also named specific targets, weapons systems to be used, and even weather reports related to the attack.

Goldberg, alarmed by the lack of security and oversight, decided to leave the chat but not before realizing the scope of the mishandling of national security. The decision to text such sensitive information to unvetted individuals via Signal, a messaging app not designed for such use, was inexcusable.

National Security at Risk: A Shocking Breach

As the news of this massive security breach broke, lawmakers and officials expressed their shock and dismay. Senator Mark Warner, the senior Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, called the leak “beyond belief,” calling it “holy crap on steroids.” He described the incident as an example of gross negligence and sloppiness that placed U.S. military operations and personnel at serious risk. Warner emphasized that the recklessness of Trump’s administration was evident, especially considering how these officials were unaware of who was in the group chat, and how they had casually shared operational details without concern for security.

“If this had been an intelligence officer who made such a mistake, they would have been fired immediately,” Warner said. He pointed out that the situation was worsened by the carelessness of officials using a messaging app meant for personal communication, when high-level security discussions should have been taking place on secure, classified channels.

Moreover, this was not the first time the Trump administration’s officials were involved in mishandling classified information. As Warner noted, this breach followed other high-profile leaks within the administration, including the release of CIA operatives’ identities—a mistake that cost the U.S. thousands of dollars spent on training agents and protecting their identities.

The Fallout: What Needs to Be Done?

This incident demands accountability. The reckless behavior of Trump’s senior officials cannot be overlooked, and serious investigations must take place to uncover the full extent of the security breach. This is especially true given that classified information was shared without any apparent regard for its potential consequences. The fact that a journalist was involved in such a sensitive conversation underscores the dangerous nature of mishandling national security protocols.

Goldberg’s reporting, which captured the details of the breach, serves as a warning sign about the state of national security under the Trump administration. The lesson here is that digital hygiene and proper use of encrypted communication platforms should be paramount in any administration. If high-ranking officials are capable of exposing highly sensitive information in such an unguarded manner, it calls into question the competence of those responsible for national defense.

It is clear that an investigation into this breach is necessary, and officials involved in the group chat, including Waltz and Hegseth, must be held accountable. It is unacceptable for senior government officials to operate in such an irresponsible and sloppy manner when the stakes are so high.

What Does This Mean for the Future?

This breach should serve as a cautionary tale for future administrations, emphasizing the importance of secure communication channels and the need for heightened vigilance in maintaining the integrity of national security practices. For future leaders, the priority should be to set strict guidelines on the handling of sensitive information and to ensure that all government officials understand the seriousness of keeping information secure.

As for the immediate future, Senator Mark Warner’s call for a prompt and thorough investigation into this breach should be taken seriously. This was not just an embarrassing mistake—it was a dangerous misstep that put U.S. service members and intelligence operations at risk. In a world of increasing cyber threats and digital vulnerabilities, it is crucial that officials responsible for national security adhere to the highest standards of operational security (OPSEC) to avoid jeopardizing American lives and global stability.

Conclusion: The Need for Accountability

The accidental leak of U.S. military plans through a commercial messaging app has revealed a serious flaw in the Trump administration’s handling of national security. Jeffrey Goldberg, by his own admission, was unprepared to be thrust into such a breach, but his reporting on the incident highlights the reckless behavior that led to this issue. If we are to prevent future security failures, both in government and beyond, officials must be held accountable for their actions.

This incident serves as a stark reminder of how easily information can be compromised in the digital age—and how crucial it is for those responsible for the nation’s security to maintain a clear, unwavering focus on protecting classified information. The consequences of neglecting such responsibilities can be devastating, and this breach must be addressed swiftly to prevent any further erosion of trust in national security systems.

.
.
.
Play video: