Behind Michael Jackson’s Darkest Video

In the realm of music, few artists have left as indelible a mark as Michael Jackson. His influence transcended genres, and his artistry redefined the music video landscape. Among his many iconic works, the short film for “Who Is It,” a single from his eighth studio album, *Dangerous*, stands out not only for its haunting narrative but also for the controversy that surrounded its production. This is the story of how a concept about love, betrayal, and identity morphed into a cinematic experience that would never see the light of day in the United States.

*Dangerous*, released in 1991, was a significant departure from Jackson’s previous albums. It showcased a more mature sound, blending pop, rock, and R&B with socially conscious themes. The album featured hits like “Black or White,” “Remember the Time,” and the poignant “Heal the World.” However, amidst this diverse collection, “Who Is It” emerged as a darker, more introspective track. Lyrically, it explored the anguish of a man grappling with betrayal, as he discovers that his lover has been unfaithful. The emotional weight of the song resonated deeply with listeners, setting the stage for a short film that would push boundaries.

The vision for the “Who Is It” short film was ambitious. Michael Jackson, known for his groundbreaking music videos, sought to create something that transcended the traditional format. He collaborated with David Fincher, a director who was rapidly gaining recognition for his innovative approach to storytelling. Fincher, who would later helm films like *Fight Club* and *The Social Network*, was at the forefront of music video direction in the late ’80s and early ’90s. His unique style, characterized by dark, moody cinematography and intricate narratives, was a perfect match for Jackson’s vision.

As the production began, the concept revolved around a man who discovers a name tag belonging to his lover, leading him to believe she is cheating on him with someone named Alex. However, the truth was far more complex. The name tag belonged to a high-end escort, and the narrative delved into themes of identity and deception. The film aimed to explore the emotional turmoil of betrayal while also shedding light on the darker aspects of love and relationships.

However, as the shoot progressed, tensions began to rise. Just three days into filming, Jackson expressed discomfort with the direction of the project. The concept of a prostitute was something he found troubling, and he ultimately decided to withdraw from the film. This decision sent shockwaves through the production team, leaving them scrambling to find a solution. Fincher, faced with the daunting task of completing the film without its star, had to think on his feet.

In a twist of fate, the production team decided to use a Michael Jackson impersonator to fill in for the absent star. This decision was not without its challenges. The impersonator, who had previously worked on other Jackson projects, arrived under the cover of night, adding an air of secrecy to the already tumultuous production. Fincher, feeling the weight of the situation, had to adapt the narrative to accommodate the impersonator’s presence. Shots were carefully crafted to obscure the impersonator’s face, utilizing shadows and angles to maintain the illusion that it was Jackson on screen.

Despite the challenges, the film took shape. Fincher’s signature style shone through, with desaturated colors and a noir-like atmosphere that heightened the emotional stakes. The focus shifted from Jackson’s performance to the intricate storytelling, allowing the narrative to take center stage. The film became a compelling exploration of love, betrayal, and the complexities of human relationships.

However, the controversial content of the short film proved to be a double-edged sword. When it was completed, the decision was made not to air it in the United States. Instead, it was replaced with a compilation video featuring clips from Jackson’s previous works. This decision was met with disappointment from fans and critics alike, as the film had the potential to be a significant addition to Jackson’s already illustrious catalog.

The short film for “Who Is It” eventually found its way to audiences in 1993, two years after the album’s release, when it was included in the *Dangerous: The Short Films* video album. However, it wasn’t until 2016 that the film was officially uploaded to YouTube, allowing a new generation of fans to experience its haunting narrative. The film’s unique approach and the circumstances surrounding its production have since garnered it a place in discussions about Jackson’s legacy.

In the years that followed, “Who Is It” became a topic of interest among fans and music historians. Rolling Stone ranked it as the 10th best video in Jackson’s catalog, highlighting its artistic merit despite the controversy. The official Michael Jackson team even created a Spotify playlist featuring underappreciated deep cuts, placing “Who Is It” near the top. This recognition served as a testament to the film’s enduring impact and the complexity of Jackson’s artistry.

As the years passed, the story behind “Who Is It” became a fascinating chapter in the annals of music history. It served as a reminder of the challenges artists face when pushing boundaries and exploring difficult themes. The film’s narrative, while rooted in the pain of betrayal, also reflected the broader struggles of identity and self-discovery that resonate with audiences across generations.

In retrospect, the journey of “Who Is It” is a testament to the power of storytelling in music. It highlights the delicate balance between artistic expression and societal expectations, as well as the lengths to which artists will go to create something meaningful. Michael Jackson’s decision to withdraw from the project may have altered its trajectory, but it also opened the door for a unique exploration of themes that continue to resonate today.

As fans reflect on the legacy of Michael Jackson, “Who Is It” stands as a reminder of the complexities of love, betrayal, and the human experience. It invites viewers to consider the stories behind the music and the artists who dare to tell them. In a world where art often mirrors life, the short film for “Who Is It” remains a poignant exploration of the intricacies of relationships and the search for truth in a world filled with deception.

In conclusion, the story of “Who Is It” is not just about a music video; it is a narrative of artistic ambition, personal struggle, and the quest for authenticity. It serves as a reminder that even in the face of adversity, creativity can flourish, and stories worth telling can emerge from the most unexpected circumstances. As we continue to celebrate the legacy of Michael Jackson, let us also honor the stories that shaped his journey and the art that continues to inspire us all.

Why does the Michael Jackson biopic have to be re-shot?

The biopic about Michael Jackson’s complicated legacy is running into some trouble.

According to a recent article by Puck , the release date of the film, starring Jaafar Jackson as  Michael Jackson , has been moved from April to October 2025 due to script-related changes.

A representative for Lionsgate, which distributed Michael, declined to comment when contacted by CNN .

Directed by Antoine Fuqua and written by three-time Oscar nominee John Logan, Michael tells the story of the music superstar who died in 2009 at the age of 50 from acute propofol poisoning.

Michael Jackson’s nephew – the son of his brother Jermaine Jackson – was cast in the lead role. Film producer Graham King praised him.

“With Jaafar, every look, every note, every dance move is Michael. He embodies Michael in a way that no other actor could,” King commented in a press release in February 2024.

“We assembled a great team of artists from makeup, hair, costume to cinematography, choreography, lighting… along with some people who worked with Michael on this film. But most importantly, Jaafar is the one who completely embodies Michael. That goes beyond the physical resemblance. It’s the spirit of Michael conveyed in a magical way,” said director Fuqua. The film also has the participation of actors: Miles Teller, Colman Domingo, Nia Long…

Big barrier

Last week, Puck ‘s Matthew Belloni reported that the $150 million film had hit a major roadblock.

The Michael script  included a 1993 investigation into sexual abuse allegations against Michael Jackson made by then-13-year-old Jordan Chandler. However, a settlement in the case reportedly included a clause prohibiting dramatization of the Chandler family (which the film’s creative team was unaware of until after filming had wrapped) that required the film to be remade, Puck reported .

Jordan Chandler isn’t the only person to accuse Michael Jackson of sexual abuse. The ” King of Pop ” denied all allegations while he was alive, and members of his family continue to do so.

In 2003, Jackson was charged with seven counts of “lewd acts with a child” based on allegations from a boy with cancer who was invited to the star’s home.

The boy said that he was 13 years old when Michael Jackson served him alcohol and touched him. Jackson pleaded not guilty and was acquitted.

In 2019, HBO released a documentary titled Leaving Neverland , which detailed disturbing claims by James Safechuck and Wade Robson that Michael Jackson sexually abused them for years when they were children.

Robson said he stayed with Jackson at Neverland Ranch, California, many times as a child. Safechuck appeared in a Pepsi commercial as a child with Jackson and confirmed that he often visited the singer’s home.

Both defended Jackson against sexual abuse allegations, but later filed lawsuits against Robson in 2013 and Safechuck in 2014 alleging sexual abuse against them.

Michael Jackson’s family denied the allegations in Leaving Neverland , calling the film a “public execution” and claiming that the accusers were motivated by financial gain.