Brittany Renner BROKE! Begs Judge for $420K/Year Child Support from NBA Baby Daddy

In a widely circulated video, influencer Brittany Renner once stated, “Athletes don’t use condoms. If you want to come up off a check from a man, just sleep with an athlete — they’re really, really dumb.” She admitted to saying it and even doubled down on it, calling it part of her “game.”

This quote has been used to highlight her alleged intentions with NBA player PJ Washington, with whom she shares a child. For years, rumors circulated that she was receiving $200,000 per month in child support from him, which she publicly denied. On a podcast, she claimed she only received $2,500 per month and insisted she was providing for her child independently, with her mother’s help. However, court documents later revealed that she was actually receiving $5,500 per month — more than double what she claimed.

Critics argue that this discrepancy undermines her image as a self-reliant mother. Furthermore, she was recorded in a heated altercation with PJ Washington and his wife during a custody exchange, with her own mother angrily pointing out that PJ had put $170,000 toward his wife while only contributing $11,000 to their son’s bank account. The recording — which appears to have been planned and saved for strategic release during PJ’s $90 million contract negotiation — only fueled accusations of manipulation and jealousy.

Brittany has since filed a petition in California court asking for $35,000 per month in child support, claiming she can no longer afford the high cost of living in Los Angeles on her current support. She also stated PJ exercises less than half of his court-ordered visitation, which is contributing to her financial stress. Despite her previous statements about independence, her court filings reveal a request not only for increased monthly payments but also for $50,000 in legal fees to be paid by PJ.

Critics are calling her out for hypocrisy — questioning why she moved to LA if she couldn’t afford it and highlighting the contradictions between her online persona and her court claims. Her opponents argue that the child should live with PJ, who has the means to support him, rather than increasing financial support to maintain Brittany’s lifestyle.

Meanwhile, PJ’s current wife has been subtly responding to the drama by showcasing her comfortable life in a “day in the life” video, which some view as petty but others see as a quiet rebuttal to the public drama.

At the core of the criticism is the belief that Brittany isn’t just seeking child support — she’s seeking lifestyle support, which many argue is not the court’s responsibility. With public records, past quotes, and public behavior used against her, many believe Brittany’s actions reflect bitterness, jealousy, and an unwillingness to adjust her lifestyle to her financial reality.