ABC Just Tried a “Gotcha” on Scott Bessent—and Instantly Regretted It

Here's How Much Scott Bessent Is Worth
In a tense interview with ABC, Scott Bessent, a prominent figure in the current administration, faced off with anchor Martha Raddatz over the ongoing government shutdown—a crisis now dragging into its 26th day. As federal employees turn to food banks and Americans feel the pinch, the network seemed poised for a classic “gotcha” moment. Instead, Bessent flipped the script.

Raddatz pressed Bessent on the suffering caused by the shutdown, asking whether the President should meet with Democrats to resolve the crisis. Bessent didn’t mince words, pointing the finger at Democratic leadership: “The American people are hostage to Chuck Schumer and Hakeem Jeffries’ poll numbers… What’s changed between now and the last time there was a clean continuing resolution is Chuck Schumer has tanked in the polls.”

He painted the situation as a political standoff, accusing Schumer and Jeffries of worrying more about their own primaries than the nation’s wellbeing. Bessent noted that 52 Republican senators had voted 11 times to reopen the government, with only three moderate Democrats crossing the aisle. “I call on moderate Democratic senators to end this craziness. You’ll be heroes,” he urged.

When Raddatz tried to turn the tables—reminding Bessent that his party controls the White House and both chambers of Congress—he didn’t flinch. “We inherited a mess,” Bessent said, citing a record budget deficit to GDP ratio. He explained that the administration had managed to reduce the deficit from 6.5% to 5.9%, insisting they wouldn’t allow irresponsible spending to return.

Bessent’s responses left little room for ABC’s “gotcha” tactics. He acknowledged the real pain caused by the shutdown, especially for military families and the broader economy, but refused to shoulder the blame alone. Instead, he called for bipartisan cooperation and fiscal responsibility.

As the interview wrapped, it was clear that Bessent had turned the tables. Instead of a headline-grabbing slip-up, viewers witnessed a rare moment of political clarity—proving that sometimes, the best defense is a good offense.