P. Diddy on Trial: Cassie Confirms ‘Sex Slave’ Jonathan Oddi’s Wild Claims

New York, NY — Explosive testimony in the federal criminal trial of Sean “Diddy” Combs has brought to light disturbing allegations involving former adult performer Jonathan Oddi, who claims he was paid to engage in sexual acts with Cassie Ventura while Combs watched. Years after Oddi’s wild statements were dismissed as the ramblings of an unstable man, Cassie herself has now corroborated key elements of his story under oath, validating one of the most bizarre and controversial chapters in the ongoing case against the hip-hop mogul.

Who is Jonathan Oddi?

Jonathan Oddi, a former stripper and adult performer, first gained notoriety in 2018 after a bizarre armed incident at the Trump National Doral Miami Hotel. Arrested following a shootout with police, Oddi made headlines for his erratic behavior and outlandish statements—including claims that he had been a “sex slave” for Diddy and Cassie. At the time, these allegations were largely ignored. But with Combs now facing federal charges of sex trafficking, racketeering, and related offenses, Oddi’s story has resurfaced with new credibility.

Cassie’s Testimony: Confirmation of Oddi’s Claims

Cassie Ventura, Diddy’s ex-girlfriend and a central figure in the prosecution’s case, took the stand to describe an 11-year relationship marked by abuse, coercion, and sexual exploitation. She testified that Combs forced her into elaborate sexual encounters with male sex workers—including Oddi—while he watched and sometimes recorded the acts.

In court, Cassie identified Oddi in a government exhibit and confirmed she and Combs had seen him several times, mostly in Miami. She recounted that Oddi had secretly recorded at least one sexual encounter, leading to months of anxiety and efforts by Combs to suppress the video. Cassie explained that she ended all contact with Oddi after discovering the secret recording, and that Combs spent significant time and money trying to ensure the footage was never released.

Defense Strategy: Protecting Cassie or Protecting Himself?

Combs’ defense team has tried to spin these revelations, arguing that he was motivated by a desire to protect Cassie from public embarrassment, not to blackmail or control her. They pointed to Cassie’s own efforts to track down and destroy the video, as well as her aggressive confrontation with a DJ who may have possessed another recording. Cassie admitted on the stand that she was “sick about it” and felt pressured by Combs to handle the situation.

Yet, Cassie’s testimony—and the corroborating accounts of other witnesses—suggests a pattern of manipulation and intimidation. She described being coerced into “freakoffs” (group sex acts), often under the influence of drugs, and said Combs used threats and violence to maintain control.

Oddi’s Side: Details from the Alleged “Sex Slave”

Oddi himself, speaking recently to NewsNation, expressed regret for his involvement and said he suspected Cassie was being abused even at the time. He described being paid $800 per session—sometimes multiple times a day—to perform sex acts with Cassie while Combs watched and pleasured himself. Oddi claimed that drugs were frequently involved, and that he once recorded a session after Cassie passed out, fearing someone might overdose and wanting to protect himself from blame.

Oddi also revealed that he signed a $5 million non-disclosure agreement (NDA) with Combs in 2014, a claim supported by divorce records and a sudden influx of cash used to buy multiple properties. His ex-wife, Tanya Troutwine, confirmed the existence of the NDA and recounted Oddi’s fear and paranoia in the years following his involvement with Combs and Cassie.

Legal and Cultural Impact

The reemergence of Oddi’s story—now supported by Cassie’s sworn testimony—has added a sensational new layer to the case against Diddy. Prosecutors allege that Combs ran a criminal enterprise, using his businesses and celebrity to abuse and exploit women, including orchestrating commercial sex acts and using blackmail to enforce silence.

The defense maintains that Cassie and others were willing participants, and that Combs never intended to harm or extort anyone. However, the prosecution’s narrative of coercion, violence, and cover-ups is gaining traction as more witnesses come forward to corroborate each other’s stories.

What’s Next?

As the trial continues, it remains to be seen whether more details about Oddi’s involvement—and possible testimony from Oddi himself—will surface. The case has already forced a reckoning within the music industry and raised uncomfortable questions about power, consent, and accountability among the rich and famous.

All parties are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. This article will be updated as the trial progresses.

Play video: