Over the weekend, federal immigration agents descended on Charlotte, North Carolina, making more than 140 arrests. The operation, led by Gregory Bo—who previously oversaw similar enforcement in Los Angeles and Chicago—has been dubbed “Charlotte’s Web” by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), after the beloved children’s book. The author’s granddaughter criticized the nickname, saying the operation contradicts her grandfather’s values.

Scenes from the operation have alarmed local residents. A U.S. citizen, Willie Acetuna, was stopped twice by masked agents, who broke the window of his truck and forcibly removed him, allegedly because he interfered with enforcement operations. Acetuna expressed fear, noting that Border Patrol agents showed no regard for citizenship status and that his truck and appearance may have made him a target.

Jacob, a senior political and national correspondent on the ground, reported that Charlotte’s experience mirrors similar operations in Chicago and Los Angeles, where American citizens were also detained without apologies from federal agents. He highlighted that federal agents are implementing a standardized, large-scale deportation strategy in cities viewed as political targets.

Local communities have mobilized in response. Groups of volunteers, referred to as ICE verifiers, are monitoring federal activity to protect residents. Miriam, one such volunteer, explained that community members are driving around to observe ICE and Border Patrol operations, ensuring safety and accountability. These volunteers also participate in organized training sessions in churches and sanctuaries to prepare safe transit for residents to schools and workplaces during enforcement actions.

Legal experts question the federal presence. Tim Emmery, a criminal defense attorney with the National Lawyers Guild, described claims of authority—such as using nearby airports as “borders”—as legally dubious. DHS cited various statutes, including the Immigration and Nationality Act, but critics argue these actions stretch legal interpretations.

Despite the controversy, local organizations have been preparing for such operations since 2017, with extensive community training and mobilization to protect residents from unannounced federal enforcement.