Elle Duncan BECOMES ESPN HOT TAKE PUPPET As She LAYS GROUNDWORK To MINIMIZE Caitlin Clark MVP SEASON

Elle Duncan’s Controversial Role in ESPN’s WNBA Coverage: A Deep Dive

On a crisp Chicago evening, the Ben Daniel Podcast went live, promising its listeners another episode of unfiltered sports commentary. The topic was hot, the opinions hotter: Elle Duncan’s alleged role as ESPN’s provocateur for the 2025 WNBA season. Ben Daniel, known for his candid style, didn’t hold back as he dissected Duncan’s commentary and its implications for rising star Caitlin Clark.

.

.

.

The podcast opened with Ben’s signature phrase, “Calling a spade a spade,” setting the tone for a no-holds-barred discussion. Elle Duncan, a respected ESPN anchor, had recently made headlines with her bold takes on the upcoming WNBA season. Critics claimed she was minimizing Caitlin Clark’s MVP potential, and Ben was ready to explore these claims.

“Elle Duncan, folks,” Ben began, his voice resonating through the speakers. “It seems ESPN has handed her the script for the 2025 WNBA season. They’re treating her like The Rock treats his audience: know your role and shut your mouth.”

Ben elaborated on Duncan’s supposed new role as ESPN’s shock jock. “She’s going to be the hottaker, the one who says the most outlandish things about the WNBA season,” he asserted. “Anyone with a brain can’t help but laugh.”

Listeners were drawn in by Ben’s colorful language, his repeated use of phrases like “What the L?” and “L M AO,” emphasizing the comedic absurdity he saw in Duncan’s comments. He painted a picture of Duncan as someone who, intentionally or not, had become a puppet for ESPN’s sensationalist narratives.

As Ben continued, he addressed Duncan’s predictions for Caitlin Clark, the Indiana Fever’s rising star. “Caitlin Clark will win MVP,” Ben stated confidently, citing her impressive odds and performances from the previous season. He acknowledged Asia Wilson’s dominance but argued that Clark was a serious contender.

Ben’s analysis was backed by statistics and observations, noting Clark’s growth and the Fever’s promising roster changes. He contrasted Duncan’s skepticism with his belief in Clark’s potential, suggesting that Duncan’s comments might be influenced by external pressures.

Throughout the podcast, Ben maintained a critical lens on ESPN’s role in shaping narratives. He questioned whether Duncan was genuinely expressing her views or if she was playing a part assigned by the network. “ESPN is facilitating all of this,” he claimed. “They’re probably telling Elle Duncan to play the Skip Bayless role, to be the thorn, the hottaker.”

Ben’s comparison of Duncan to Kendrick Perkins rather than Skip Bayless was particularly biting. “Skip Bayless is a Hall of Famer in his own right,” he said. “Elle’s playing the Kendrick Perkins role, with her nonsense and hot takes.”

Listeners were captivated by Ben’s passionate delivery and incisive critiques. He explored the concept of voter fatigue, which Duncan had mentioned as a reason Clark might not win multiple MVPs. Ben challenged this notion, arguing that it was more likely to energize voters against Clark than to hinder Wilson’s chances.

The podcast reached a crescendo as Ben delved into the historical context of MVP voting, referencing past winners and the dynamics of the voting process. He acknowledged Duncan’s point about voter fatigue but insisted that her historical bias undermined her credibility.

Ben wrapped up the episode by addressing his audience directly. “Let’s call a spade a spade,” he repeated. “Elle Duncan’s bitterness and resentment grow every day. At this point, she’s embarrassing herself.”

The podcast concluded with Ben inviting listeners to share their thoughts. “Let me know what you think in the comments section below,” he said, fostering engagement and debate among his audience.

As the episode ended, listeners were left with a deeper understanding of the complexities surrounding sports commentary and the influence of media narratives. Ben Daniel’s podcast had not only entertained but also provoked thought and discussion, leaving its mark on the ever-evolving landscape of sports media.

Play video: