Dem Congressman Demands Pete Hegseth Resign NOW – “Get the HELL OUT!”

Get the HELL OUT! Dem Congressman Carbajal’s Fiery Showdown Demands Pete Hegseth Resign in Explosive Defense Hearing

A Congressional Clash for the Ages: Carbajal vs. Hegseth

In a scene reminiscent of the most heated moments in American political drama, Democratic Congressman Salud Carbajal unleashed a scathing, relentless attack on Defense Secretary nominee Pete Hegseth, demanding his immediate resignation and branding him a “bipartisan embarrassment.” The exchange, which unfolded during a high-stakes congressional hearing, was more than just political theater—it was a full-throated indictment of Hegseth’s leadership, judgment, and alleged lawbreaking.

Millions of Americans tuned in, expecting routine oversight. Instead, they witnessed a meltdown that will be replayed for years in political highlight reels.

The Takedown: “You’re Not Worthy of My Attention”

Carbajal, a Marine Corps veteran, wasted no time. From the opening seconds, he made his stance unmistakably clear. “Not today, Hegseth. Yes or no?” Carbajal demanded, refusing to let the nominee wriggle free with evasive answers. When Hegseth tried to dodge, Carbajal cut him off: “I’m not going to waste my time anymore. You’re not worthy of my attention or my questions. You’re an embarrassment to this country. You’re unfit to lead.”

The congressman’s fury was not just personal—it was bipartisan. “There have been bipartisan members of Congress that have called for your resignation. You should just get the hell out and let somebody competent lead this department.”

Deployment Controversy: “We Are Warfighters, Not Crowd Control”

Carbajal’s anger was rooted in more than just partisan politics. He blasted the administration’s deployment of National Guard and Marines to Los Angeles, calling it “political theater” and a dangerous politicization of America’s armed forces.

“I served in the Marine Corps. We are trained to be warfighters, not for crowd control,” Carbajal said, his voice echoing the concerns of veterans across the country. “Everyone here should be alarmed that the president has sent armed forces into a city against the wishes of a governor and mayor.”

When pressed on whether Marines in Los Angeles were ordered to “protect property by any means necessary,” Hegseth dodged. Carbajal demanded clarity, not cable news spin. Finally, when asked about the use of warning shots, Hegseth relented: “No.” Carbajal’s response: “Now that’s more like it. Isn’t that easy?”

Classified Information Scandal: “You Broke the Law”

The hearing took a darker turn as Carbajal accused Hegseth of sharing classified information in a private group chat that allegedly included a journalist, his wife, and his brother. “You broke the law in sharing classified information and in doing so endangered the lives of our service members that you are responsible for. Your inability to hold yourself accountable makes you incapable to lead.”

Hegseth, for his part, maintained his communications were authorized, but Carbajal was unmoved. “You have done nothing to inspire confidence in your ability to lead competently.”

Ukraine, NATO, and Trump Allegiance: The Yes-or-No Gauntlet

Refusing to let Hegseth off the hook, Carbajal demanded simple yes-or-no answers on critical national security issues: continued support for Ukraine, honoring NATO’s Article 5 obligations, and whether allegiance to Trump is required for service.

Repeatedly, Hegseth tried to nuance his responses. Repeatedly, Carbajal cut him off: “Just yes or no. This isn’t Fox anymore.” When Hegseth finally answered “yes” to Article 5, Carbajal pounced: “Good. I’m glad you brought yourself to saying yes.”

But when asked about Trump loyalty, Carbajal grew even more impatient. “I’m not going to waste my time anymore. You’re not worthy of my attention or my questions. You’re an embarrassment to this country.”

Decorum Disintegrates: “Is This Really Leadership?”

The tension in the chamber was palpable. Carbajal’s outburst prompted calls for decorum. “Mr. Chairman, do we not have any decorum in here?” Carbajal asked, before yielding his time. The chairman reminded everyone to maintain the dignity befitting the chamber, but the damage was done. The moment was already viral.

Republican Defense: “Thank You for Bringing Strength Back to Our Military”

As the dust settled, Republican Congressman Scott DesJarlais of Tennessee stepped in, offering a stark contrast. He thanked Hegseth and General Kane for “bringing pride, strength, and respect back to our military,” and defended the president’s deployment of troops as consistent with historical precedent.

DesJarlais cited Eisenhower, Kennedy, Johnson, and Bush’s use of federal troops, arguing that “nothing that we’re doing on the ground is unprecedented.” Hegseth agreed, saying the real anomaly was “a governor and a mayor unwilling to protect law enforcement.”

The Nuclear Question: Modernizing America’s Deterrent

The hearing shifted to nuclear policy, with DesJarlais asking about the Sea-Launched Cruise Missile (SLCM-N) program. Hegseth praised Congress for keeping the program alive, promising a “thousand percent increase” in funding in the upcoming budget. General Kane affirmed the need for modern deterrence, especially in the face of evolving threats from Russia.

Conclusion: A Bipartisan Embarrassment or a Political Lightning Rod?

The hearing was more than a policy debate—it was a referendum on leadership, accountability, and the future of America’s defense. Carbajal’s fiery demand for Hegseth’s resignation will reverberate in Washington for weeks. His words—“Get the hell out and let somebody competent lead”—echo the frustration of a divided Congress and a nation weary of political theater.

Whether Hegseth survives this onslaught remains to be seen. But one thing is certain: this was not just a hearing. It was a reckoning.

Key Takeaways:

Congressman Carbajal accused Pete Hegseth of incompetence, lawbreaking, and endangering troops.
Carbajal demanded Hegseth’s immediate resignation, calling him a “bipartisan embarrassment.”
The hearing exposed deep divisions over troop deployment, classified information, and loyalty to President Trump.
Republicans defended Hegseth, citing historical precedent and the need for nuclear modernization.
The showdown will fuel debate over military leadership and accountability for months to come.

End.