Elon Musk CRUSHES The View After Winning Lawsuit Against Whoopi Goldberg

If you missed the latest viral clip of Whoopi Goldberg passionately calling for a boycott of X (formerly Twitter), you missed a comedy masterclass—and a glimpse into the tangled web of modern media, business, and hypocrisy. As Whoopi rails against Elon Musk and his platform, she seems oblivious to the irony that her own show, “The View,” is a product of Disney, the same company now locked in a high-stakes feud with Musk.

The scene feels less like daytime TV and more like the prelude to Whoopi accidentally canceling herself. Every spontaneous comment risks becoming legal ammunition in the ongoing Disney vs. Musk saga.

Musk’s Meltdown and the Boycott Backlash

Elon Musk, the richest man in the world, recently lost his cool at a leadership summit when asked about advertisers fleeing X after his response to anti-Semitic posts. Whoopi couldn’t help but point out the irony: even with billions, Musk can’t buy peace or shield himself from the fallout of his own actions.

Musk’s response was blunt:
“If somebody’s going to try to blackmail me with advertising, blackmail me with money, go f*** yourself.”
He argued that the advertising boycott would kill X, and he’d make sure everyone knew who was responsible.

But Musk’s troubles were self-inflicted. He openly supported a tweet referencing the “great replacement theory,” a favorite among white nationalists. Outrage followed, and advertisers like Apple, IBM, and Disney swiftly pulled out. Musk later admitted his tweet was “the worst and dumbest” he’d ever posted, but the damage was done.

Disney’s Dilemma and Whoopi’s Contradiction

Disney, led by Bob Iger, is no stranger to conflict with Musk. Their rivalry dates back years, from rejected SpaceX launch sites to media battles. Now, Disney’s market value has plummeted—from $267 billion in 2021 to $169 billion today—and its stock has dropped over 40%. Artistic flops and endless remakes haven’t helped.

If Musk’s threats of legal action succeed, Disney could face even more trouble. Ironically, Whoopi Goldberg, whose show is produced by ABC (owned by Disney), is calling for a boycott of X, mirroring Disney’s own tactics. She urges viewers to “join us who have stopped” using X, claiming it’s a statement of principle.

Yet, Whoopi herself has asked for forgiveness and tolerance after her own controversial comments about Jews and World War II. The double standard is glaring: she demands accountability for Musk but wants understanding for herself.

The Bigger Picture: Boycotts or Censorship?

The debate goes beyond one tweet or one celebrity. Musk sees corporate boycotts as an attempt to silence dissenting voices through financial pressure—a new form of censorship disguised as moral outrage. Disney’s decision to pull ads isn’t just a business move; it’s a calculated attack on a platform and a person they find ideologically troublesome.

Whoopi’s support for the boycott inadvertently backs the very business tactics Musk vows to fight. The question becomes:
Do businesses have the right to use their financial power to shut down competitors or public figures they disagree with? Or is this just censorship in a moral disguise?

Let the Chips Fall Where They May

As the dust settles, it’s clear that social media outbursts and corporate boycotts can spark firestorms and drag powerful companies into public brawls. Figures like Whoopi Goldberg, who have survived their own scandals, now lead the charge for a new kind of accountability—one that’s selective and self-serving.

So, what do you think?
Is it a business’s right to use its financial clout against rivals and controversial personalities? Or is this a dangerous new form of censorship that threatens free expression?