Jim Jordan EXPOSED Adam Schiff LIES About Trump. The Schiff Scandal They Tried to Hide (Full Truth)

For years, a singular narrative dominated the American airwaves, fueled by a high-ranking official who claimed to hold the ultimate “smoking gun.” Adam Schiff, as Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, wasn’t just another voice in the crowd; he was the gatekeeper of the nation’s most sensitive secrets. When he looked into the camera and told the American people he had “more than circumstantial evidence” of collusion between Donald Trump and Russia, millions believed him.

But as the dust settles and official reports—from Inspector General Michael Horowitz to Special Counsel John Durham—finally see the light of day, a different picture is emerging. It isn’t a picture of a compromised president, but of a compromised process. Today, we go beyond the soundbites to expose the full truth behind the Schiff scandal that Congressman Jim Jordan has fought to bring to light.

The Authority of the Chair: A Betrayal of Public Trust

The weight of Adam Schiff’s claims came from his position. As Jim Jordan recently noted, “This wasn’t just any member of Congress… This was the chairman of the intel committee, the committee that gets additional information than the rest of us get.”

When a typical politician makes a partisan claim, the public takes it with a grain of salt. But when the man who oversees the CIA, the NSA, and the FBI says he has “proof,” it carries the force of law. Schiff used this perceived authority to go on television night after night, insisting that the evidence was “clear” and “damging.”

We now know, following the release of the Durham Report, that this “proof” was built on a foundation of “baloney.” The investigation revealed that the FBI’s “Crossfire Hurricane” probe was launched without any actual evidence of collusion in their holdings. The narrative was, in Jordan’s words, a “fabricated narrative from a seat of extreme power.”

The “Dirt” and the Double Standard

During a heated committee exchange, Schiff pivoted the conversation to the infamous Trump Tower meeting, where Donald Trump Jr. was offered “dirt” on Hillary Clinton. Schiff framed this as “compromise,” suggesting that the mere willingness to listen to an offer of foreign help was disqualifying.

“My colleagues may think it’s okay that the Russians offered dirt… and the president’s son did not call the FBI,” Schiff argued.

However, Jordan and his allies have pointed out a glaring double standard. While Schiff attacked the Trump campaign for a meeting that yielded no actual information, the Clinton campaign and the DNC were actively funding the Steele Dossier—a collection of unverified, salacious rumors sourced from Russian contacts.

The Durham Report confirmed that the Clinton campaign played an “outsize role” in pushing these collusion claims to the media and the FBI. Schiff didn’t just ignore this; he read portions of the discredited Steele Dossier into the Congressional Record, effectively laundering political opposition research into official government history.

The FISA Abuse: 17 Errors and Omissions

Perhaps the most technical—and most chilling—part of this exposure involves the FISA court. To spy on Trump associate Carter Page, the FBI had to obtain warrants from a secret court. Adam Schiff released a “memo” at the time, defending the FBI and claiming the warrants were justified.

Inspector General Horowitz later demolished that defense. His report uncovered 17 significant errors and omissions in the FISA warrant process. The FBI had misled the court, failing to mention that their primary source had admitted the dossier was unreliable and that Page had actually cooperated with the CIA in the past.

Schiff’s memo, which once dominated the news cycle as a “fact-check” on Republican claims, was revealed to be a document that “misled the American public,” leading to his eventual censure by the House of Representatives.

The Media’s Role: Retractions and Regrets

This scandal wasn’t just a political failure; it was a media failure. Outlets like the Washington Post and CNN acted as a megaphone for Schiff’s claims. For three years, the American public was fed a steady diet of “breaking news” that suggested an imminent indictment for treason.

Recently, the tide has turned. The Washington Post has had to issue rare retractions and apologies for parts of their reporting on the Steele Dossier after sources like Igor Danchenko were exposed. Jim Jordan highlighted this shift: “So much baloney that the Washington Post had to walk it back.”

The Damage Done: A Divided Nation

The cost of this “collusion” narrative cannot be measured only in legal fees or airtime. It is measured in the loss of trust in American institutions. By weaponizing classified information and using his position to spread falsehoods, Schiff didn’t just target a president; he targeted the truth itself.

The Durham Report concluded that “the Department and the FBI failed to uphold their important mission of strict fidelity to the law.” When leaders in Washington lie to the public and face no consequences, the foundation of democracy begins to crumble.

The Fight for Accountability

Jim Jordan’s crusade to expose these lies isn’t just about defending Donald Trump; it’s about ensuring that a “special access” chairman can never again use the veil of secrecy to mislead the nation.

“If you believe we need to hold Washington to the truth,” Jordan has signaled, “the fight for honesty is just getting started.” As more documents are declassified and more whistleblowers come forward, the Schiff scandal serves as a stark warning: in the halls of power, the most dangerous weapon isn’t a secret—it’s a lie told by someone you’re supposed to trust.