New York Times Host Gets Visibly Angry as Her Trap for Megyn Kelly Backfires Spectacularly

In a recent episode of the New York Times podcast, tensions ran high as the host tried to corner Megyn Kelly with pointed questions about Donald Trump’s past allegations. What followed was a masterclass in media pushback, as Kelly not only refused to take the bait but flipped the script on the host, leaving her visibly frustrated and scrambling for control.

The Trap Is Set

The interview started with the host pressing Kelly on Trump’s history of sexual abuse allegations, referencing the E. Jean Carroll case and multiple accusations by other women. “Donald Trump was found liable for sexual abuse in a civil court. He’s been accused by many women. You don’t believe any of that?” the host asked, hoping to catch Kelly in a moment of contradiction or denial.

Megyn Kelly Doesn’t Flinch

Kelly’s response was direct and unapologetic. She dismissed the Carroll allegation, saying, “I don’t believe one word of that,” and acknowledged she had interviewed some accusers herself. She admitted Trump had taken “inappropriate liberties with women” but insisted it wasn’t a deal-breaker for her as a voter. “Do I find that a deal breaker for a possible politician? Not really,” she said, emphasizing that she had given those women a platform but ultimately let the audience decide.

Turning the Tables

Rather than getting trapped, Kelly pivoted to criticize what she called the hypocrisy of Democrats. “My problem is more with these Democrats who will bury these allegations against their candidates or their candidate spouses and then play holier than thou when they’re looking at Donald Trump,” she said. The host, clearly looking for a gotcha moment, found herself on the defensive as Kelly accused mainstream journalism of hiding biases and creating distrust among viewers.

Owning Her Bias—And the Room

Kelly doubled down on her position, openly stating her support for Trump and arguing that transparency about her bias actually enhances her credibility. “Now everybody has zero doubt about where I stand and they can filter everything I say through the appropriate lens,” she explained. The host’s attempts to paint Kelly as blindly partisan only backfired, as Kelly contrasted her openness with what she called the media’s hidden agenda.

From Scandal to Substance

Refusing to engage further on decades-old allegations, Kelly shifted the conversation to policy issues: border security, crime, and education. She argued that these issues matter far more to voters than “Trump getting handsy with somebody 20 years ago.” Her passionate defense of her priorities left the host unable to regain control, visibly irritated as Kelly called out her “liberal values” and suggested that even New York Times readers benefit from conservatives protecting their freedoms.

A Viral Moment

By the end of the segment, viewers were left with a clear impression: the host’s trap had backfired, and Megyn Kelly had walked away with the upper hand. The podcast episode quickly made waves online, with many praising Kelly’s composure and ability to redirect the narrative.

Conclusion

In an age where media interviews often devolve into partisan traps, Megyn Kelly’s latest appearance proved that authenticity and confidence can turn the tables—even on the most prepared hosts. For the New York Times, this was a lesson in what happens when the interviewer becomes the story, and the guest refuses to play by the expected script.