Katy Perry’s Real Estate Scandal Deepens as Chris Pratt Pulled Into $15 Million Montecito Dispute

Actor Chris Pratt has unexpectedly been drawn into an ongoing legal controversy surrounding Katy Perry’s purchase of a $15 million Montecito estate—a transaction that is now at the center of a high-profile real estate and elder rights dispute.

The property in question was sold by Carl Westcott, an 85-year-old retired veteran and entrepreneur, who has since claimed that he was not mentally competent at the time of sale due to age-related cognitive decline and recent medical treatments. According to legal filings, Westcott alleges he was under heavy medication and lacked full awareness when he signed over the deed.

Perry Accused of Misrepresentation

What initially appeared to be a routine celebrity real estate deal has escalated into a legal and ethical storm, particularly after new information emerged suggesting that Katy Perry may have misrepresented the condition of the property.

In earlier legal responses, Perry and her representatives claimed the home was “uninhabitable” and in need of extensive renovation, suggesting that any delay or reversal in the purchase would cause significant financial harm. However, that narrative is now under scrutiny.

Chris Pratt and Katherine Schwarzenegger Enter the Scene

Legal documents reveal that shortly after Perry finalized the purchase, she allegedly leased or temporarily granted access to the property to actor Chris Pratt and his wife, Katherine Schwarzenegger, who were reportedly staying at the residence while their own nearby home underwent renovations.

This revelation has cast doubt on Perry’s claims about the estate’s condition and could potentially undermine her legal position. If the home was indeed livable enough to house a high-profile couple, it contradicts her team’s earlier assertion that the property was “not suitable for occupancy.”

“This discrepancy raises serious questions about whether the statements made to the court were entirely truthful,” said a source familiar with the case.

Chris Pratt May Be Subpoenaed

Attorneys representing Carl Westcott have indicated they may subpoena Chris Pratt and Katherine Schwarzenegger to testify regarding the actual livability and condition of the home during their time there. Their testimony could prove pivotal in determining whether Perry knowingly exaggerated the home’s disrepair to expedite or justify the transaction.

“If Mr. Pratt testifies that the property was indeed in acceptable living condition, that could significantly impact Ms. Perry’s credibility,” a legal analyst told The Hollywood Ledger.

Public Scrutiny and Ethical Questions

The case has sparked broader public debate about celebrity real estate deals and the protection of elderly homeowners, especially those dealing with cognitive or medical issues. With high-value transactions often shielded behind LLCs and legal teams, critics argue that wealth and influence may be used to pressure vulnerable sellers.

While Katy Perry has not commented publicly on the newest developments, her legal team maintains that the sale was valid, legal, and conducted in good faith.

Chris Pratt’s representatives have declined to comment, though sources close to the actor say he was unaware of any underlying legal or ethical concerns during his brief stay at the property.

The case is set to move forward in court later this year—and all eyes will be on whether one of Hollywood’s most bankable stars may be compelled to testify in a case that’s becoming more complex by the day.