15 Epstein Files Go Missing — DOJ Denies Any Trump Connection

The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) is facing renewed scrutiny after reports emerged that 15 files connected to the late financier Jeffrey Epstein are unaccounted for, raising fresh questions about record-keeping, transparency, and political accountability. Federal officials, however, have firmly rejected speculation that the missing documents are linked in any way to former President Donald Trump.

The issue surfaced following a routine internal review of archived materials related to Epstein’s federal investigations, according to multiple sources familiar with the matter. The review reportedly identified discrepancies between documented file inventories and materials currently held by the DOJ, prompting concerns that a small but significant number of records may be missing or misfiled.

DOJ: “No Evidence of Political Interference”

In a statement released on Tuesday, the Department of Justice acknowledged that a limited number of documents could not be immediately located, but emphasized that there is no evidence of intentional removal, destruction, or political interference.

“There is no indication whatsoever that these records are connected to any current or former elected official, including former President Donald Trump,” a DOJ spokesperson said. “Any suggestion to the contrary is false and irresponsible.”

Officials added that the missing files are believed to consist primarily of administrative records, not sealed indictments or evidentiary materials tied to ongoing investigations. An internal audit is currently underway to determine whether the documents were misplaced, transferred to another federal archive, or duplicated elsewhere.

Epstein Case Continues to Spark Controversy

Jeffrey Epstein, a wealthy financier with ties to powerful figures in politics, business, and entertainment, was arrested in July 2019 on federal charges of sex trafficking minors. He died by suicide in a New York detention facility the following month, under circumstances that continue to fuel public skepticism and conspiracy theories.

Although Epstein’s death ended the criminal case against him, public interest has remained intense, particularly regarding who may have known about or facilitated his activities. Over the years, court documents and media investigations have revealed contact between Epstein and numerous high-profile individuals, though mere association has not equated to criminal wrongdoing.

Trump Mentioned — and Denied

Speculation surrounding former President Trump resurfaced after social media users and political commentators suggested, without evidence, that the missing files could involve past interactions between Trump and Epstein. Trump has previously acknowledged knowing Epstein socially in the 1990s but has stated that he severed ties long before Epstein’s legal troubles became public.

The DOJ reiterated that none of the missing records implicate Trump, and that his name does not appear in connection with the unaccounted files in any investigative capacity.

A spokesperson for Trump also dismissed the claims as “baseless political smears,” stating that the former president has never been accused or charged in connection with Epstein’s crimes.

Calls for Transparency

Despite official reassurances, lawmakers from both parties have called for greater transparency. Several members of Congress have urged the DOJ to release a detailed report outlining the nature of the missing files and the steps being taken to locate them.

“Given the extraordinary public interest in the Epstein case, the Department owes the American people a clear and thorough explanation,” said one senior lawmaker on the House Judiciary Committee.

Civil liberties groups echoed those concerns, arguing that the disappearance of any files tied to a case of this magnitude undermines public trust, even if no wrongdoing is ultimately found.

What Happens Next

The DOJ has stated that its internal review is ongoing and that results will be shared with congressional oversight committees once complete. Officials stressed that the investigation into Epstein’s network remains active through related civil cases and separate criminal inquiries, some of which are being handled at the state level.

For now, authorities maintain that the missing files do not alter the known facts of the Epstein case and caution against drawing conclusions before the review is finished.

As the audit continues, the episode highlights how the legacy of Jeffrey Epstein continues to reverberate through the American legal and political system — fueling questions that, years later, remain deeply unsettling to the public.