Recently, a heated debate erupted in the basketball world after Angel Reese boldly declared herself the “Michael Jordan of the WNBA.” The statement quickly made waves across social media, drawing both praise and criticism. However, it was ESPN analyst Stephen A. Smith who delivered the most scathing response.

On his popular sports talk show, Stephen A. Smith didn’t hold back. He questioned Reese’s credentials, pointing out that while she is undoubtedly talented and has made a significant impact since entering the league, comparing herself to Michael Jordan—a global icon and arguably the greatest basketball player of all time—was a massive stretch. Smith highlighted that Jordan’s legacy was built on years of dominance, championships, and changing the game itself, whereas Reese is still early in her professional career.

Smith went further, analyzing Reese’s stats and performances, and argued that while she has great potential, she has yet to prove herself at the level required to earn such a lofty comparison. He urged Reese to focus on her game and let her achievements speak for themselves, rather than making bold proclamations that could put unnecessary pressure on her and invite criticism from fans and analysts alike.

The segment quickly went viral, with fans debating whether Smith was too harsh or simply telling the truth. Some supported Reese’s confidence and ambition, while others agreed with Smith, saying that greatness comes with time and consistency. The incident has fueled ongoing discussions about the standards for greatness in women’s basketball and how young stars should navigate media scrutiny.

In the end, Stephen A. Smith’s fiery critique served as both a reality check and a challenge for Angel Reese: keep working, keep winning, and maybe one day, the comparison to Michael Jordan will be earned through undeniable greatness on the court.