‘What Else Did You Lie About’ — Hawley BRUTALLY Destroys Dem Nominee for Trying to Lie to His Face

Washington, D.C. — A heated Senate confirmation hearing erupted into a viral showdown Wednesday as Senator Josh Hawley (R-MO) confronted President Biden’s nominee for a key federal post, accusing him of lying under oath and demanding answers in a tense, nationally televised exchange.

The Confrontation

The nominee, Dr. Samuel Larkin, tapped for Assistant Secretary of Health, faced tough questions from the Senate Judiciary Committee regarding his previous statements on public health policy and his personal record. Early in the hearing, Senator Hawley zeroed in on discrepancies between Larkin’s written testimony and public comments he’d made in recent months.

“Dr. Larkin, you told this committee last week that you never advocated for mandatory school closures. But here you are in a July 2021 interview, saying they were ‘necessary for public safety,’” Hawley said, holding up a printed transcript. “Which is it?”

Larkin attempted to clarify, insisting his comments had been taken out of context. But Hawley pressed harder, reading direct quotes and providing video evidence. “So you lied to the committee?” Hawley asked sharply. “What else did you lie about?”

A Moment of Tension

The exchange quickly escalated, with Larkin stammering as Hawley listed other apparent contradictions: statements about mask mandates, vaccine distribution, and federal funding for local health departments. Each time, Hawley presented documentation—news articles, social media posts, and government records—contradicting the nominee’s sworn statements.

“I’m not here to play games,” Hawley declared. “The American people deserve honesty. If you’re willing to lie about this, what else are you hiding?”

The committee room was silent as Larkin struggled to respond. Other senators looked on, some visibly uncomfortable, while audience members and press scrambled to capture the moment.

Democratic Response

Democratic senators attempted to intervene, arguing that Hawley’s line of questioning was overly aggressive and that some discrepancies could be attributed to evolving scientific understanding. Senator Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) said, “Let’s remember these were unprecedented times. We all made decisions based on information available at the moment.”

But Hawley was undeterred. “That doesn’t excuse lying under oath,” he retorted. “It’s not about changing your mind—it’s about telling the truth.”

Public Reaction

Within hours, video clips of the exchange flooded social media, with #Hawley trending nationwide. Conservative commentators praised Hawley’s relentless approach, while progressive voices accused him of grandstanding. The nominee’s credibility became a flashpoint in the broader debate over political accountability and transparency.

Fox News aired extended segments of the hearing, with pundits calling for Larkin’s withdrawal. Meanwhile, MSNBC highlighted the pressure nominees face in today’s polarized climate.

Political analyst Dr. Marisa Grant commented, “This moment illustrates the stakes of public service in the digital age. Every word is scrutinized, and even minor misstatements can become major scandals.”

Aftermath

As of Thursday morning, Dr. Larkin’s nomination remains in limbo. Senate leaders have called for a review of his testimony, and sources say the White House is “reassessing” its support. Hawley, meanwhile, has vowed to continue his investigation, stating, “We cannot allow deception at the highest levels of government.”

The episode has reignited calls for reform in the confirmation process, with advocates urging nominees to be fully transparent about their records and beliefs.

Conclusion

In an era of instant information and partisan scrutiny, Senator Hawley’s grilling of Dr. Larkin serves as a reminder of the importance of truthfulness in public office—and the high price of getting caught in a lie.