Obama decided to ‘GASLIGHT THE PUBLIC’ about Kirk’s assassination

The country is still reeling after the assassination of Charlie Kirk, but instead of honesty, clarity, and accountability, Americans are being fed a steady diet of gaslighting.

Obama’s Spin: Blame Trump, Deflect Responsibility

Former President Barack Obama took to the stage with what many are calling a carefully crafted deflection. Rather than acknowledge the toxic rhetoric that has poured out of his own party for years, Obama framed the assassination as a story of “extremism on both sides.”

But to millions watching, the message was clear: this was yet another attempt to quietly blame Donald Trump and the 77 million Americans who voted for him. To hear Obama speak, you would think Trump’s supporters are the extremists tearing this country apart — not the very radicals now glorifying Kirk’s murder.

The Killer’s Words Speak for Themselves

While the media dithers about “no motive,” court documents and even the shooter’s own words make things clear. Tyler Robinson admitted he was “sick of Kirk’s hatred” and saw him as irredeemable. Engraved on one of his bullet casings? The word “Fascist.”

This wasn’t random. This wasn’t a crime of passion. This was a political hit, fueled by years of Democratic leaders, media elites, and activist groups painting conservatives as Nazis, fascists, and enemies of progress.

Media Gymnastics: Humanizing a Killer

If the double standard feels sickening, it’s because it is. Reporters who spent years demonizing Kirk as a dangerous agitator are now bending over backwards to humanize his killer.

One journalist described Robinson’s texts to his partner as “touching” and “intimate,” framing him as a love-struck young man rather than a cold-blooded assassin. Others speculated it was all about “defending a relationship” — not ideology.

Meanwhile, Kirk’s supporters, grieving families, and everyday Americans scroll through social media only to find gleeful posts celebrating his death. The disconnect is jarring.

A Web of Radical Influence

Now, law enforcement is widening the net. Investigators are probing whether radical groups may have encouraged, aided, or even known about the assassination before it happened.

One organization, Armed Queers FLC, scrubbed its Instagram after Kirk’s murder. In a chilling past statement, its founder declared: “Sometimes violence must take place for tangible change.”

That is not political discourse. That is open justification for bloodshed.

The Bigger Picture: A World They Created

For years, Democrats and their allies in the press have pushed the narrative that America is teetering under the weight of fascism, that Trump and his supporters are a threat to democracy itself. They mainstreamed the fringe, normalized the abnormal, and vilified millions of working-class Americans.

Now, as the consequences of that rhetoric spill into the streets, they don’t want you to believe your eyes. They want you to forget the cheering posts, the violent slogans, the real motives carved into shell casings.

But no amount of gaslighting can hide the truth: the murder of Charlie Kirk was not born in a vacuum. It was born in the climate the Left helped create.