“3 Chilling Bigfoot Videos That Challenge All Doubts, Featuring Rare Trail Camera Footage and Evidence That Leaves Skeptics Speechless”

Three Bigfoot Videos That Deserve Real Scrutiny (Not a Lazy Countdown)

Most “top 3 Bigfoot videos” lists are just hype: shaky clips, shallow commentary, and the same tired punchline—“man in a suit.”

This is not that.

Below is a long-form narrative article version of your transcript—structured like a documentary deep-dive—covering three clips that, when taken seriously, present a stronger case for authentic Sasquatch footage than most people are willing to admit.

The Premise: If Sasquatch Is Real, Some Evidence Should Look Different

I’m about to show you three more of the most compelling Bigfoot videos ever captured—and explain exactly why they point to real Sasquatches, not people in suits.

My name’s Robert. I’m a Canadian filmmaker and researcher, and ever since my own encounter in September 2024, I’ve been digging as deep as it takes to separate folklore from reality. That means looking at footage the way a filmmaker looks at footage: motion, anatomy cues, behavior, context, and what would actually be required to fake it.

Let’s get into the three clips.

1) The Provo Canyon Footage (Utah, 2012)

In late October or early November 2012, a short video hit YouTube and went viral almost immediately. It showed a group of campers in Provo Canyon, Utah, filming what they initially assumed was a bear crouched in brush.

Then the figure stood up.

And the entire mood of the video changes in a fraction of a second—from casual curiosity to raw panic.

What we know (and what we don’t)

Filmed near Provo Canyon, around the Little Rock Canyon overlook / nearby peak area
Uploaded by a user called Beard Card (a BYU culture reference)
Filmed with a consumer digital camera (exact model unknown)
Covered by local outlet KSL, then amplified nationally
No precise coordinates, no follow-up investigation, limited metadata

So why does it still matter?

Why the footage hits so hard

1) The reaction doesn’t look “performed”

The group isn’t acting like people executing a planned reveal. They’re not narrating. They’re not positioning themselves for a perfect shot. They’re reacting in the exact messy way humans react when their brains suddenly scream: that is not what I thought it was.

If it were staged, you’d need:

an actor in brush,
a planned camera angle,
a convincing “bear to bipedal” transition,
and multiple people delivering believable fear on cue.

Possible? Sure. Likely? Not compared to a genuine surprise event.

2) The stand-up moment shows the wrong kind of limb

Skeptics often call it “blob-squatch” because it’s not crisp. Fair. But even in low detail, motion can carry truth.

When the figure rises, what appears—at least in several zoomed-in versions—is a large left arm swinging into view. And crucially, it doesn’t move like a bear foreleg re-positioning under a standing animal. It looks like a long, hanging limb.

3) The head reads as “compact on shoulders”

The campers say they could see it looking at them. When you scrub frame-by-frame, you can make out a head shape with dark contouring on one side, and a hunched posture that reads as forward-facing attention.

It also resembles the classic Sasquatch description: a head sitting squarely on massive shoulders with little visible neck.

Professional review

Utah video/CGI specialist Mitch Phillips has publicly analyzed the clip and concluded:

no signs of digital manipulation,
movement and fur appearance read as organic,
reactions appear authentic,
and he believes the clip supports Bigfoot’s reality.

The skeptical pushback (and why it doesn’t kill it)

“Too blurry.” True—but blur doesn’t erase motion cues.
“No context.” True—but this clip was also hammered by millions of viewers quickly, and no clean hoax proof ever emerged.

Bottom line: Provo Canyon is not a “clear creature study.” It’s a short, ugly clip with one major strength: the stand-up transition looks wrong for a bear and hard to stage convincingly.

2) The Josh Highcliff “Skunk Ape” Footage (Mississippi, 2013)

On October 24th, 2013, around 6:00 p.m., a hog hunter named Josh Highcliff filmed something behind a large tree, just west of Tuna, Mississippi—a region many consider classic “skunk ape” habitat.

He keeps the camera fixed for close to a minute.

Then the figure stands—nearly doubling in height.

And he runs.

What makes this one different

1) It does something—it works a stump

The most compelling part isn’t the silhouette. It’s the behavior.

The subject appears to:

grip wood,
lever it out of a stump with a two-handed action,
and toss debris aside.

That kind of purposeful manipulation reads more like a strong animal foraging than a human performing “monster theater.”

2) The audio matters: wood sounds like wood

You can hear distinct snapping/tearing sounds that don’t resemble someone ripping foam or a staged prop. Even if the stump were rotten (a common skeptic counter), the sound still suggests real force on real material, not pantomime.

3) The description is unusually specific

The original posting includes details—date, general location, circumstances, even a note about an iPhone mishap—that read more like a field note than a hoax caption.

Hoaxers often avoid specifics because specifics can be checked.

The three common skeptic alternatives

Human in a suit

Black bear at a stump

bipedal rise

Escaped gorilla

Bottom line: Highcliff is compelling because it combines behavior + sound + movement—not just “a thing standing there.”

3) The Birch Bay Trail Cam Footage (Washington, 2021)

Around April 28th, 2021, a motion-triggered trail cam on a 10-acre homestead in Birch Bay, Washington captured a large upright figure striding past with what looks like mass, momentum, and intent.

It was later posted by Jimmy B Trail Cams.

Why trail cams matter

Trail cams are boring. That’s the point.

They’re usually the opposite of hoax culture: deer, raccoons, coyotes, owls—routine wildlife. When something anomalous appears, the default assumption should be “incidental capture,” not “planned performance.”

Key credibility points

1) Known camera model

The camera is identified as a Stealth Cam STC-DS4KMAX, which matters because camera behavior (compression, low-light processing) affects interpretation.

2) A single continuous pass with consistent gait

The subject maintains a smooth, forward-leaning stride through brush. It doesn’t stop to pose. It doesn’t perform for the lens. It just moves like it’s going somewhere.

Supporters also point to:

a pronounced forward lean,
leg angles during stride that resemble patterns discussed in other cases (including PGF comparisons),
steady arm swing consistent with heavy locomotion.

3) Environmental interaction

Branches and undergrowth show subtle displacement as the figure passes—tiny cues that are hard to fake convincingly with digital overlays.

4) Provenance: a wildlife-focused channel

Jimmy B’s channel is primarily local wildlife content. That pattern reduces the probability of an elaborate one-off stunt.

5) Third-party archiving and analysis

The clip was archived/geotagged by RMSO (Rocky Mountain Sasquatch Organization), which also published a scale discussion.

The skeptic criticisms (and the honest answer)

“It’s just a guy.” Possible in theory, but would require motive + access + timing + willingness to walk past an active trail cam on a homestead.
“Scaling is uncertain.” True. Height estimates depend on lens, distance, camera placement. But even with error bars, the stride and speed through brush remain notable.
“Infrared/low-light smears edges.” True, but smearing doesn’t easily explain coherent, continuous, powerful locomotion plus consistent environmental interaction.

Bottom line: Birch Bay is compelling because it looks like what you’d expect from a trail cam capturing something real: brief, unglamorous, and physically consistent.

Closing: Three Clips, Three Different Strengths

Each of these pieces of footage has weaknesses—limited metadata, imperfect clarity, lack of follow-up. But they also have strengths that are hard to dismiss simultaneously:

Provo Canyon: the stand-up transition + limb impression + authentic fear response
Highcliff: two-handed stump work + wood audio + sudden size change on standing
Birch Bay: trail-cam provenance + continuous powerful gait + brush interaction

If Sasquatch is real, the best evidence won’t always be a perfect close-up. Sometimes the most honest clips are the ones that look accidental—because they are.