Mike Johnson Just SHUT DOWN Jamie Raskin — And the TRUTH Was Unleashed!—Truth Bombshell Rocks the Hearing!

Jaime Raskin Censured: House’s “Moral Compass” Falls Under Ethics Fire

Washington, D.C. — The House chamber was silent, stripped of theatrics and applause, as Congressman Jaime Raskin—once hailed as the moral compass of the Democratic Party—faced a reckoning. The man who led the charge to impeach a president now sat under oath, exposed by the very standards he once weaponized.

.

.

.

Double Standards Exposed

Speaker Mike Johnson, calm and relentless, read aloud Raskin’s own words from the congressional record. In 2017, Raskin objected to the certification of Donald Trump’s election—an act he would later denounce as sedition when performed by Republicans in 2020. Clips and documents revealed a pattern: Raskin condemned electoral challenges as attacks on democracy, except when he himself made them.

Johnson laid out the contradiction: “You weren’t a defender of the Constitution. You were its first exploiter in the Trump era.” Raskin’s selective application of law and process, his rapid-fire impeachment of Trump without investigation, and his silence on Democratic scandals were all exposed.

Ethics Referral and Censure

The evidence mounted:

Zero action on Democratic abuses
Suppressed ethics complaints
Internal memos urging political timing over constitutional basis
Votes protecting party interests, not principles

Johnson formally referred Raskin to the House Ethics Committee for misuse of authority, suppression of minority input, and misleading the public on constitutional standards. Moderate Democrats fractured, supporting the referral and censure. The media narrative shifted; Raskin’s reputation as a legal scholar was now under review.

A Stunning Fall

The House voted to censure Raskin, 278 to 143—a bipartisan rebuke of the man who once lectured the nation on democracy and law. His committee roles were stripped, his party distanced itself, and his scheduled appearances were quietly cancelled. Local papers demanded his resignation, and primary challengers surged.

Three weeks later, the Department of Justice concluded its review:

No criminal indictment, but permanent removal from committee leadership
Formal reprimand for systemic misuse of congressional authority

Legacy Reversed

Raskin, once a professor of law and impeachment manager, became a cautionary tale. His name was scrubbed from fundraising emails and historical web pages. Even academia turned away, cancelling lectures and protesting his appearances.

He tried to defend himself, blaming political targeting, but the facts were public—and damning. The scholar who preached accountability was exiled by the very system he claimed to uphold.

The Verdict

Raskin’s downfall wasn’t dramatic—it was constitutional. He built his career on predicting the fall of democracy, but became its most elegant executor, rewriting the margins of law for partisan gain. In the end, the law didn’t sentence him—it footnoted him, permanently.

The House’s moral compass has been recalibrated, and Jaime Raskin’s name now stands as a warning: No one is above the standards they set for others. Not even the scholar in the spotlight.