Eric Schmitt PLAYS Secret Biden Video That SHOCKS Every Democrat

.
.

🎥 Eric Schmitt Plays Secret Biden Video That SHOCKS Every Democrat: The War Against ‘Lying Eyes’

A Senate hearing focused on President Joe Biden’s cognitive fitness and the question of who was truly governing the nation erupted when Senator Eric Schmitt (R-MO) played a montage of clips directly contradicting the public narrative maintained by Democratic officials and the mainstream media.

The hearing, conspicuously ignored by minority members who chose not to attend or present witnesses, became a stage for Republicans to argue that Biden’s inner circle undertook coordinated efforts to mislead the public regarding his cognitive state, effectively running the country outside of established executive channels.

I. The Public Narrative vs. Private Panic

The core of the confrontation lay in the stark contrast between the public defense of President Biden’s fitness and the growing evidence of private concern among those closest to him.

The Orchestrated Defense

Senator Schmitt introduced the montage, stating that it compiled “previous statements from Biden administration officials and Democratic party officials telling us not to believe our lying eyes.” The clips featured a range of officials vehemently defending the President’s capabilities:

Dismissing Concerns as Absurd: Officials called questions about his stamina “absurd” and “right-wing propaganda.”
Hyperbolic Praise: Aides used excessive descriptors, insisting the President is “sharp, intensely probing, and detail-oriented,” possesses “vision” and “knowledge,” and has an “incredible command of the details.”
The “Age as Asset” Pivot: The narrative eventually shifted from defending his basic capacity to praising his age, claiming his “age is an asset” and his “wisdom and experience has been invaluable.”

The Private Reality

Schmitt highlighted that while this public defense was being orchestrated, the reality behind the scenes suggested deep concern:

Behind-the-Scenes Scrambling: According to reports, former Speaker Nancy Pelosi was “reportedly working the phones in a behind-the-scenes bid to remove him from the ticket.”
Early Withdrawal Plans: A book claimed Democratic officials “staged hush-hush talks to plan for Biden’s withdrawal as the party’s presidential nominee as early as 2023.”

The Fifth Amendment Defense: Crucially, several of Biden’s top aides—including Anthony Bernal and Annie Thomasini—pleaded the Fifth Amendment during House Oversight Committee depositions regarding the President’s mental decline. Even more shockingly, his own doctor reportedly did the same.

The presentation aimed to prove that the public facade of a “sharp and capable” president was an organized effort to conceal a debilitating truth, effectively turning the government’s official statements into political spin.

II. The Constitutional Crisis: Who Was Running the Country?

The central, unanswered question posed during the hearing was: “Who was running the country under Joe Biden?”

The Absence of Executive Decision-Making: As one witness, who had worked in the previous administration, testified, the Trump White House had an “exhaustive process to determine how paper flowed into the Oval and when the president had given his assent to a certain action.” The question implied that such a verifiable paper trail does not exist for the Biden administration.
The Oversight Findings: The House Oversight Committee’s findings reportedly claimed there is “no record demonstrating President Biden himself made all the executive decisions” attributed to him. The committee concluded that his inner circle “undertook coordinated efforts to mislead the public regarding his cognitive state.”
The Nullification Recommendation: Based on these findings, the Oversight Committee referred the matter to the Department of Justice (DOJ), recommending that executive actions performed by White House staff and merely signed by the President be regarded as “null and void.” The committee also referred Biden’s personal physician to the D.C. Board of Medicine for producing potentially “false or misleading medical reports.”

III. Media Complicity and the Lack of Curiosity

The hearing also served as a stage to criticize the mainstream media for its starkly contrasting coverage of the mental acuity of President Biden versus President Trump.

The ‘Lack of Curiosity’

Former Trump Press Secretary Sean Spicer testified that the media, driven by a desperate desire to ensure Trump never returned to office, maintained a double standard:

Trump Scrutiny: During the Trump administration, the media would “seize on the simplest thing” and often “manufacture instances” to question his fitness.
Biden Shield: In vast contrast, there was a near-total “lack of any kind of curiosity” regarding President Biden, even when there were “multiple issues of physical, mental confusion, him going in the wrong direction, him falling down, him misunderstanding an event.”

Spicer highlighted that media conversations with the administration revealed a deliberate choice not to pursue the story, with many journalists simply “afraid to go there” because the narrative would not align with their political objectives.

Profiting from the Chaos

The irony deepens as the very aides and officials who were allegedly involved in misleading the public are now attempting to profit from their silence. The narrative is that some are now releasing books about the events they helped distort, signaling a disturbing trend of profiting from the chaos they helped create, further eroding public trust in the entire political system.

.