Kamala Harris DESTROYED by ABC News — EXPOSED Lying About Biden & Failing 2028 Presidential Run!

.
.

📰 Vice Presidential Book Tour Under Scrutiny: Kamala Harris’s Media Strategy Meets Unexpected Pushback

Former Vice President Kamala Harris’s recent book tour, aimed at promoting her work and positioning her for future political contests, has encountered an unexpectedly hostile media environment. Transcripts and clips from her appearances on podcasts and network shows, notably an interview with ABC News, reveal a pattern of direct challenges to her narrative—a development uncharacteristic of typical high-level political appearances. This scrutiny has focused intensely on her account of her 2020 primary loss, her public stance on President Joe Biden’s cognitive fitness, and the viability of her future presidential aspirations.

📉 The Narrative of Loss and the Claim of a “Close Race”

During a podcast appearance, Harris described her reaction to her 2020 primary defeat as a state of “shock,” likening the emotional impact to the grief she felt when her mother died. She recounted her campaign manager informing her they needed “200,000 more votes that we can’t find.”

This recollection has been met with heavy criticism from political commentators. Critics point to the fact that she lost the popular vote by a significant margin and failed to secure major primary wins, arguing that the suggestion of a “close race” is disingenuous. The critique suggests that Harris, despite a $200 million campaign war chest, was unable to secure the necessary support and that her dramatic portrayal of the loss is an attempt to garner sympathy and rewrite her political history.

🎯 The ABC Interview: Confronting Biden’s ‘Frailties’

The most viral and consequential exchange occurred during an interview with ABC News, where the interviewer pressed Harris on whether her primary defeat was a result of President Joe Biden’s “failure to recognize his own frailties.” This question directly challenged Harris to either break with the current administration’s narrative or defend a position many observers found politically damaging.

Harris initially attempted a “world-class pivot” by immediately shifting the focus to President Donald Trump. She accused Trump of “misrepresenting his intentions” regarding economic issues like lowering prices and distracting the public with “misinformation.”

The interviewer, however, abruptly interrupted her, stating, “I want to interrupt you because that is a world-class pivot but it is not the question that I asked you, which is about Joe Biden’s failure to recognize his own frailties.”

This direct intervention, which forced Harris to return to the original question, is rare in high-profile political interviews and left Harris visibly flustered.

The Capacity Defense

Under continued questioning, Harris offered a nuanced, yet heavily criticized, distinction regarding the concerns over Biden’s abilities:

“There is a very serious difference between capacity to be president of the United States and the capacity to run for president of the United States.”

She asserted that she never doubted Biden’s capacity to be president. However, she admitted that she had “concerns”—as noted in her book—about his ability to “endure what a race for president of the United States would require” in the political environment of 2024, citing the necessary “level of endurance [and] energy.”

Critics immediately denounced this distinction as an attempt to protect her current political position while simultaneously validating the public concerns about Biden’s physical and mental stamina required for a national campaign.

✋ Staff Intervention and Credibility Concerns

A highly unusual moment further fueled the narrative of a campaign struggling to maintain control: during the ABC interview, a member of Harris’s staff abruptly cut the interview short, interjecting that the session had gone too long.

The interviewer, Sarah Ferguson, expressed surprise, noting that this level of intervention by a politician’s staff—especially for a figure of Harris’s rank—was almost unprecedented. Commentators widely interpreted this action as a sign that Harris’s staff lacked confidence in her ability to navigate difficult questions and feared potential misstatements if the interview continued, suggesting that they view her as a risk that needs to be tightly controlled.

🔮 The 2028 Outlook: Outsider Status

Harris’s media challenges extended to her prospects in the 2028 presidential race. In a separate BBC interview, she was directly confronted with bookmakers’ odds that reportedly placed her as an “outsider, even behind Dwayne ‘The Rock’ Johnson.”

Harris dismissed the concern, stating, “I’ve never listened to polls. If I listened to polls, I would have not run for my first office or my second office.”

However, commentators were quick to point out the historical contradiction: Harris dropped out of the 2020 primary race before the Iowa caucuses due to consistently low poll numbers and fundraising issues, undermining her claim of ignoring public sentiment. The comparison to Dwayne Johnson, a popular non-politician, served as a stark public challenge to her political viability, suggesting that the public—or at least market indicators—view her path to the presidency with extreme skepticism.

In summary, Harris’s book tour has highlighted a difficult political calculus: she must leverage her past and the current administration’s position to build a future platform, yet she is being consistently pressured to answer for the perceived failures of both. The direct media scrutiny she has faced suggests that her path forward will be marked by intense challenges to her political narrative and personal credibility.

.