🔥’Who the F*** Is She?’ Somali RIVAL Clan COOKS Ilhan Omar as Omar Fateh LOSES Mayoral Race

.
.

🔥 “Who the F*** Is She?” Somali RIVAL Clan Cooks Ilhan Omar as Clan Politics Explode in Minneapolis Mayoral Race

The political tensions surrounding Representative Ilhan Omar reached a boiling point during the recent Minneapolis mayoral race, revealing deep, entrenched clan divisions within the city’s Somali-American electorate. Omar’s preferred candidate, Omar Fateh, was defeated, a loss critics attribute to the deliberate mobilization of rival Somali clan factions who voted for the winning candidate, Mayor Jacob Frey.

The electoral result has exposed the pervasive role of “tribal politics” in local U.S. governance and triggered a raw public confrontation where Omar was verbally attacked by a Somali rival who questioned her loyalty and identity.

I. Clan Politics Undermine Progressive Unity

The recent Minneapolis mayoral election has brought to light the internal fragmentation within the city’s significant Somali-American community, where political alignment appears to follow traditional tribal loyalties rather than simple party lines.

Exploiting Clan Divisions

Reports suggest that the victory of incumbent Mayor Jacob Frey was achieved by strategically exploiting existing rivalries within the Somali electorate.

Political Fragmentation: The core issue is the breakdown of the Somali vote, with reports indicating that different Somali clans actively campaigned for opposing candidates. As one commentator noted, this is a clear case where “Somali clans wouldn’t vote for that Omar guy because he was from a different clan,” underscoring the dominance of kinship ties over ideological unity.
The Outcome: The defeat of Omar Fateh, the candidate favored by Representative Omar’s faction, illustrates how the continuation of “Somalian tribal politics” is actively influencing and fragmenting the Democratic-leaning vote in Minneapolis.

The Confrontation

The frustration over this political division boiled over in a public confrontation where Representative Omar was attacked by a Somali rival.

The Direct Challenge: A woman, speaking in Somali (with English phrases interspersed), directly challenged Omar’s status and influence, shouting, “Who the f* is she?”** and demanding, “You have to show who you are.” This attack went viral, revealing the deep lack of respect and animosity directed at Omar from within her own community bloc.
A Self-Admitted Problem: This internal discord aligns with a common observation among some members of the Somali community: “Our people is the most divided people in the world. We are bringing this kabilist [clan-based] thing to America. The same thing that killed our country, the tribalism.”

The revelation of this divisive political strategy underscores the challenges of integrating diverse immigrant populations whose political allegiances are dictated by historical and ethnic ties that often override American political norms.

II. Omar’s Defensive Rhetoric and the Deportation Paradox

Representative Omar, who is often a vocal proponent of immigrant rights and anti-deportation policies, recently gave a controversial answer regarding her own potential deportation, which critics swiftly deemed hypocritical.

The ‘I Don’t Care’ Stance

When asked in an interview about the persistent threats from conservative figures to strip her of American citizenship and deport her, Omar adopted a dismissive posture: “I don’t even care. I don’t know how they take away my citizenship and like deport me. But it’s… I don’t even know like why that’s like a such a scary threat.”

She emphasized her adulthood and financial stability: “I’m not the eight-year-old who escaped war anymore. I’m grown. My kids are grown. Like I can go live wherever I want if I wanted to.”

The Hypocrisy of Empathy

Critics immediately seized on this statement, pointing out the hypocrisy inherent in minimizing the severity of deportation:

Contradiction: Omar is a leading voice for policies that treat deportation as a profound human rights tragedy and a life-destroying event. Yet, when applied to her own situation, she makes deportation sound like “it’s not that big of a deal,” suggesting she “can go live wherever I want.”
The Privilege Gap: The criticism highlights a vast privilege gap. For most immigrants, deportation means losing everything—jobs, homes, and family structures—and being sent back to an uncertain or dangerous future. Omar’s comment suggests that her wealth and prominence shield her from the reality of the very policies she advocates against, exposing a significant disconnect between her political rhetoric and her personal circumstances.

III. Chicago Candidate Indicted Amid Political Chaos

The segment concluded with a brief note on the political chaos impacting other Democratic aspirants, referencing the federal indictment of a Chicago congressional candidate, Kate Abba Gazali.

The Charges: Gazali, who was running for Congress in Chicago, was federally indicted for allegedly preventing ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) officers from doing their job while protesting deportations.
The Visuals: The visual evidence presented showed Gazali and a crowd protesting deportations, chanting “Down with deportation” and “We save our siblings,” directly confronting federal officers.

The reference to this incident, which led to a federal indictment, serves as a final example of the legal and ethical boundaries being tested by radical progressive activists who are attempting to translate activism into congressional power, often resulting in direct confrontations with the law.

.