CONGRESS ERUPTS as Mike Johnson & Jim Jordan DESTROY Ilhan Omar TO PIECES After Defund Police Speech

.
.

CONGRESS ERUPTS AS MIKE JOHNSON & JIM JORDAN DESTROY ILHAN OMAR TO PIECES AFTER DEFUND POLICE SPEECH

WASHINGTON, D.C. – A congressional hearing intended to discuss public safety and law enforcement devolved into a fiery ideological battleground, with House Republican leaders Jim Jordan (R-OH) and Mike Johnson (R-LA) launching a coordinated attack to dismantle the progressive “Defund the Police” narrative, led by Representative Ilhan Omar (D-MN).

The confrontation focused on Omar’s explicit call to “completely dismantle the Minneapolis Police Department,” which Republicans argued is a reckless, destructive policy that has directly led to skyrocketing crime rates across the nation. Jordan and Johnson used Democrats’ own words against them, accusing the party of abandoning common sense and prioritizing radical ideology over the safety of American families.

OMAR’S DECLARATION: DISMANTLE THE MPD

The debate was sparked by Rep. Omar’s defiant speech, where she stood firm in her conviction against funding police forces she views as corrupt:

“I will never cosign on funding a police department that continues to brutalize us. And I will never stop saying not only do we need to disinvest for in police, but we need to completely dismantle the Minneapolis Police Department.”

To Omar and her progressive allies, the Minneapolis Police Department (MPD) is “rotten to the root,” and defunding or dismantling it is a necessary step for “survival” and establishing a system built on “justice” rather than “oppression.”

JORDAN’S INDICTMENT: DUMB POLICIES, BAD RESULTS

Republican firebrand Jim Jordan seized the moment to launch a scathing counterattack, framing the defund movement as a core failure of Democratic governance.

1. The Predictable Disaster

Jordan argued that the consequences of these policies are entirely predictable:

“Shouldn’t be surprised when you get more crime. When you enact dumb policies, imagine this, you get bad results.”

He framed the debate as practical, rooted in “common sense,” accusing Democrats of turning cities into political experiments where citizens are the test subjects.

2. Quoting the Receipts

Jordan went further, methodically naming leading Democrats and quoting their own calls to cut police funding, insisting these were not isolated incidents but a coordinated message:

Pramila Jayapal: Called for “shifting significant resources from law enforcement.”
Cori Bush: Publicly tweeted, “No, we mean defund the police,” on the same night President Biden said, “Fund the police.”
Jerry Nadler: Advocated for “substantial cuts to the police budget.”

Jordan literally waved printed quotes from Democrats as proof, ensuring that the party could not escape its own public record.

JOHNSON’S KNOCKOUT: HYPOCRISY IN ITS PUREST FORM

Congressman Mike Johnson zeroed in on the profound hypocrisy of the Democratic Party’s actions regarding public safety leadership:

1. Empowering Abolitionists

Johnson highlighted the staggering irony of the Democrats’ committee assignments:

“The person that House Democrats chose to chair the crime subcommittee… said that it was a mandate to defund the police.”

Omar, who once served as Vice Chair of the Crime Subcommittee, was empowered to shape public safety policy while advocating for police abolition. Republicans mocked the irony, arguing that Democrats were now trying to rewrite history, acting as defenders of police during Police Week after once demanding their budgets be gutted.

2. The Personal Cost of Ideology

The Republican strategy successfully tied the ideological stance to real-world devastation, using hard numbers:

New York: Slashed $1 billion from its police budget.
Chicago: Cut $80 million.
Seattle: Reduced funding by $69 million.

The result, Jordan argued, was a predictable disaster: violent crime soared, carjackings spiked, and families were left vulnerable. Republicans framed the data to prove that Defunding doesn’t protect people; it endangers them.

CONCLUSION: LAW AND ORDER VS. REIMAGINATION

The House confrontation effectively reframed the entire debate as one of common sense versus ideology. Jordan and Johnson painted a vision of a country where law and order—backed by a funded police force—must come before political correctness.

They delivered a collective message: “We will never let radical activists dictate America’s safety.”

The clip highlights that Omar’s call to “reimagine” policing—a phrase Republicans now mock as code for disorder—is political poison. Omar’s decision to embrace the “Defund, Abolish, and Dismantle” narrative, while occupying a seat of power, has served as a rallying cry for the GOP and a dividing line for the Democratic Party, reminding everyone that in the end, true patriots stand their ground against ideologies that threaten the country’s core.

.
play video: