Congress ERUPTS As Senator Kennedy FURIOUSLY Destroy Biden General After His Arrogant Response

.
.

Congress Erupts as Senator Kennedy Destroys Biden General After Arrogant Response

WASHINGTON, D.C. – A Senate hearing intended for routine oversight erupted into a ferocious and deeply revealing political confrontation when Senator John Kennedy (R-LA) dismantled a Biden-appointed general’s credibility, exposing his extreme partisan bias and contempt for millions of Americans.

The general, whose identity was not fully confirmed in the provided clip but who was testifying on the use of the military in border enforcement, found his career aspirations shredded after Kennedy used the general’s own words—calling the former President a “total fascist”—against him.

Kennedy’s questioning served as a surgical exposure of what critics call the “D.C. swamp” and the “expert class” who hide their partisan contempt behind claims of professional duty.

The Nuclear Question: Open Borders and Partisan Contempt

Senator Kennedy initiated the exchange by focusing on the general’s policy stance regarding immigration, quickly establishing the partisan nature of the witness’s views.

KENNEDY: “You believe in open borders, don’t you?”

GENERAL: “I believe in the rule of law, sir.” (A classic non-answer, designed to evade a direct policy stance.)

Kennedy pressed the issue, recognizing the general was a “partisan hack hiding in a uniform.”

KENNEDY: “And it makes you angry that President Trump does not believe in open borders, doesn’t it?”

GENERAL: “Not in the slightest, sir. Again, I am not here to discuss immigration policy.”

Kennedy then delivered the final psychological blow, exposing the general’s perceived arrogance.

KENNEDY: “And it makes you angry that most Americans don’t believe in open borders, doesn’t it?”

The general’s continued refusal to address the policy question, despite his clear enthusiasm for a specific interpretation of the “rule of law,” allowed Kennedy to move directly to the core evidence of the general’s political bias.

The Receipt: Calling a Commander-in-Chief a “Fascist”

Kennedy produced a folder containing the general’s own words from a public appearance, effectively ripping away the witness’s façade of professional neutrality.

Kennedy read the quote aloud, confirming the general’s extreme partisan rhetoric:

KENNEDY (Reading): “President Trump is not like any sane leader. I’m very proud of General Milley for saying that President Trump is a total fascist.… The reality is that they [MAGA Republicans] are in fact fascists themselves.”

The general, a sitting military officer, was caught having publicly denounced the former President, his former commander-in-chief, as a “total fascist,” and having labeled millions of American voters who support the MAGA movement as fascists.

KENNEDY: “Did I read that accurately?”

GENERAL: “I believe so. Yes. Senator, I am happy to discuss my personal perspectives with you separately at any time. That’s not the purpose of the hearing today.”

The attempt to evade accountability by claiming “personal perspectives” failed spectacularly. Kennedy seized on the general’s hypocrisy.

KENNEDY: “You think you’re smarter than the American people, don’t you? You think you’re more virtuous?”

GENERAL: “Senator, I am insulted by your comment.”

The general’s claim of being “insulted” after publicly insulting over half the country—calling millions of citizens “literal fascists”—underscored the total breathtaking arrogance of the D.C. elite, who believe they operate under a different standard of moral conduct.

The Kill Shot: Duty, Honor, Respect

Kennedy’s questioning served to dismantle the general’s suitability for high office by contrasting his rhetoric with the military’s core values.

The general had opened his testimony by invoking the sacred military principles of “duty, honor, and respect.” Kennedy threw those exact words back in his face.

KENNEDY: “Duty, honor, and respect. You talked about that in your opening statement, didn’t you?… Your words are worthless. You wrap yourself in the flag while you despise the people you swore an oath to protect.”

Kennedy’s cross-examination of the witness transformed the general’s public remarks from mere political commentary into evidence of insubordination and professional misconduct. A general officer, by publicly aligning himself with extreme partisan rhetoric and despising the citizens he swore to serve, violates the very oath of his office.

The general’s career was left severely damaged, exposed as a “partisan hack” with “unadulterated contempt for more than half of the country.”

The hearing became a crucial moment of accountability, proving that even high-ranking members of the D.C. “expert class” cannot hide their contempt for the American people when forced to answer direct questions under the scrutiny of Congress.

.