Congress ERUPTS In APPLAUSE As Brandon Gill EDUCATES Clueless Jasmine Crockett On Immigration

.
.

CONGRESS ERUPTS IN APPLAUSE AS BRANDON GILL EDUCATES CLUELESS JASMINE CROCKETT ON IMMIGRATION

 

WASHINGTON, D.C. – A congressional hearing intended to address the impact of immigration policy quickly turned into a masterclass in political rhetoric and factual exposé, as Congressman Brandon Gill (R-TX) systematically dismantled the progressive narrative on border security and illegal immigration.

Gill, refusing to be drawn into emotional deflections, focused his argument on two core principles: The purpose of the U.S. immigration system is to benefit American citizens, and the mass influx of illegal aliens is driven by a calculated political strategy to secure permanent electoral power for the Democratic Party.

The exchange, featuring a stark contrast between Gill’s logical, fact-based approach and Representative Jasmine Crockett’s attempt at deflection, drew heavy criticism for Crockett’s misleading tactics and wide praise for Gill’s directness.

CROCKETT’S DEFLECTION: WHITE SUPREMACY VS. ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION

 

Representative Crockett began her rebuttal by accusing Gill and his Republican colleagues of manufacturing a “boogeyman” out of immigrants and having “selective compassion.”

She then attempted to redirect the conversation entirely by focusing on horrific U.S. mass shootings:

The False Equivalence: Crockett cited the mass shootings in Buffalo, Charleston, and El Paso, noting that the perpetrators were U.S.-born white supremacists, not immigrants. She argued that since the U.S. has homegrown violent criminals, border security concerns are misplaced.
The Flawed Logic: Gill and his supporters immediately highlighted the absurdity of this comparison. The argument that because the U.S. has domestic criminals, it should therefore “open the floodgates and import more potential crime and chaos” is a complete deflection. As critics noted, the existence of one problem (domestic terrorism) is not a logical argument for ignoring another (illegal border crossings).

 

The Rhetorical Trick: Blurring the Lines

 

Crockett repeatedly employed a deceptive rhetorical technique by consistently using the broad term “immigrants” when the debate—and Gill’s entire line of questioning—was specifically about “illegal aliens” and “undocumented individuals.”

The Goal: This tactic is designed to paint Gill and proponents of border security as “anti-immigrant bigots,” intentionally conflating legal immigration (which most Republicans support) with mass illegal immigration (which strains the system).
The Result: Gill refused to take the bait, forcing the discussion back to the distinction between those who follow the rules and the millions who have crossed the border illegally.

 

GILL’S FOCUSED EXPOSÉ: THE IMPACT ON AMERICAN CITIZENS

 

Congressman Gill did not get emotional or distracted. He cut right through Crockett’s noise to detail the measurable, real-world consequences of open-border policies on American citizens.

 

1. Real-World Economic and Social Strain

 

Gill argued that the “invasion of over million illegal aliens” directly harms the American working class:

Economic Impact: The influx “depresses American wages” and “prices our working class out of owning a home.”
Systemic Strain: It severely “strains our education and health care system” and dramatically “grows the welfare state.”
Safety Concerns: He reminded colleagues that open borders “flood our communities with violence and drugs.”

 

2. The Hard Truth on Crime

 

Gill delivered a stark, fact-based rebuttal to the suggestion that illegal immigration does not increase crime:

“Your intellectualizing about illegal alien crime notwithstanding, I’d like to remind you that the correct number of American citizens murdered or raped by illegal aliens is zero.”

This statement, though shocking, strategically emphasized the non-negotiable value of protecting every American life and challenging the progressive argument that Americans must simply tolerate illegal alien crime in the name of political expediency.

 

THE BOMBSHELL REVELATION: ELECTORAL POWER

 

The most critical part of Gill’s testimony was his answer to the question of why Democrats are so determined to flood the country with millions of illegal aliens.

Gill’s answer was an airtight analysis of the political benefits, backed by a direct quote from Democratic leadership:

 

The Census/Apportionment Advantage

 

Gill explained the fundamental, yet often overlooked, mechanism that awards political power to “blue states”:

Population vs. Citizenship: Congressional seats and, therefore, Electoral College votes are awarded based on total population, not just the number of citizens.
The Power Shift: Counting millions of non-citizens results in “more seats for blue states and fewer congressional seats for red states.” Gill pointed out that excluding non-citizens would cost California an estimated three congressional seats, while swing states like Ohio and Pennsylvania would gain power. “The presence of millions of illegal aliens in America could quite literally change the balance of power in our country.”

 

Schumer’s Confirmation

 

Gill then proved that this is not a conspiracy theory by quoting Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer directly:

“Our ultimate goal is to help the dreamers, but get a path to citizenship for all million or however many undocumented there are here.”

This quote exposes the final, critical step in the strategy: mass amnesty and citizenship for illegal aliens, which ultimately allows them to vote. Gill concluded that this entire “invasion” is a calculated political strategy to secure a permanent political majority by changing the entire electorate, not an act of simple “compassion.”

The conclusion of the exchange was a clear victory for Gill, who remained focused, logical, and unapologetic in his defense of American citizens, effectively exposing a political strategy that uses illegal immigration to fundamentally corrupt the nation’s democratic system.

.
play video: