Fed up Wesley Hunt SNAPS at Jamie Raskin, puts an end to his BS once & for all

.
.

Fed Up Wesley Hunt SNAPS at Jamie Raskin, Puts an End to His BS Once & for All

Introduction: A Battle Over the Truth in the Census and Election Integrity

In recent weeks, a heated debate has unfolded over the integrity of the 2020 Census, the political manipulation of district maps, and the broader issue of election security. Congressman Wesley Hunt of Texas delivered a fiery rebuke to Congressman Jamie Raskin, cutting through the political noise and exposing the truth about the ongoing partisan battles shaping America’s electoral landscape. Hunt’s outspoken stance highlights the critical importance of accurate census data, fair representation, and the dangers posed by radical gerrymandering and illegal immigration. As the political stakes rise, Americans are increasingly concerned about whether their votes truly count and if the system is rigged against them.

The Fight Against Gerrymandering and the 2020 Census

The controversy began with the mid-decade partisan gerrymandering efforts aimed at consolidating political power for one side. Despite significant legal setbacks in California, Utah, and federal courts in Texas, these efforts continue unabated. The goal: to redraw the political map in favor of the party in power, often at the expense of fair representation.

But the broader attack is now targeting the very foundation of American democracy—the 2020 Census itself. President Trump, and many like him, argue that the census was “rigged” to favor Democrats and radical left policies. In a recent social media post, Trump declared, “We must keep the majority at all costs. Republicans must fight back,” framing the census as a tool to maintain political dominance rather than an impartial count of the population.

The Truth About the 2020 Census and Its Errors

The reality is far more complex. The U.S. Census Bureau, under scrutiny, has admitted to making several errors in the 2020 report, which have significant implications for representation and electoral power. Notably, these errors disproportionately affected deep red states such as Arkansas, Florida, Mississippi, Tennessee, and Texas—states that tend to vote Republican. The bureau undercounted populations in these states, denying them fair representation in Congress and the Electoral College.

Meanwhile, blue states like Delaware, Hawaii, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New York, Ohio, and Rhode Island were overcounted. These inaccuracies, whether accidental or deliberate, have led to the loss of six House seats for Republicans and the gain of twelve seats for Democrats—totaling an 18-seat advantage for the left.

The Role of Illegal Immigration and Unconstitutional Manipulation

A core issue in the census debate involves the inclusion of illegal immigrants in population counts used for apportionment. Critics argue that sanctuary cities and states ignoring immigration laws have used illegal residents to manipulate district boundaries, effectively diluting the votes of legal citizens. This practice, they contend, is unconstitutional and undermines the legitimacy of representation.

The inclusion of illegal immigrants in census data, despite legal and constitutional challenges, has been a contentious point for years. Studies have shown that illegal immigrants rarely vote, yet their presence in population counts can influence district lines and political power. The question arises: should individuals who are in the country illegally be allowed to influence elections and leadership choices? The consensus among many conservatives is that this must be zero.

The Impact of Census Errors on Representation

The 2020 census errors had tangible consequences. By undercounting certain populations, states lost congressional seats and electoral votes. Conversely, overcounting in other states inflated their representation. This imbalance not only skews political power but also affects federal funding allocations, which are tied to population data.

The miscounting has cost Republicans at least six House seats, and the inclusion of illegal immigrants has granted blue states an additional 12 seats. This shift in power can influence policy decisions, federal resource distribution, and the balance of political influence for years to come.

Election Integrity and Voter ID Laws

Beyond the census, the debate extends to election integrity measures. Hunt emphasized that states like Texas and Florida have implemented strict voter ID laws, requiring voters to show valid identification before casting ballots. These measures are designed to prevent illegal voting and ensure that every vote counts.

Despite these efforts, critics argue that illegal voting is negligible, citing studies that show minimal instances of non-citizens voting in federal elections. Nonetheless, proponents believe that rigorous verification processes are essential to maintaining public trust and safeguarding democracy.

The Problem of Illegal Voting and How to Prevent It

Hunt passionately argues that illegal voting undermines the legitimacy of elections. Even with stringent laws, he points out that illegal votes still slip through in many states, especially those with lax verification processes. In Texas, for example, voters must show ID, but the verification of citizenship status is often weak or nonexistent.

He advocates for zero tolerance—if someone is in the country illegally, they should not be allowed to vote under any circumstances. The integrity of elections depends on strict enforcement of voter ID laws, verification of citizenship, and secure voting procedures.

The Broader Political Implications

The ongoing battles over the census, district maps, and voter ID laws reveal a deeper ideological divide. Conservatives like Hunt see these measures as essential safeguards against fraudulent votes and unconstitutional manipulation. Progressives, on the other hand, often oppose strict voter ID laws, arguing they suppress voter turnout among minorities and the disadvantaged.

This clash reflects a fundamental question: how do we ensure fair, representative, and secure elections? The answer, many believe, lies in transparent processes, adherence to constitutional principles, and the honest enforcement of election laws.

The Role of Media and Political Narratives

Media coverage plays a pivotal role in shaping public perception. Supporters of election integrity emphasize the importance of truthful reporting and transparency, while critics accuse opponents of spreading misinformation to undermine democracy. The narrative often becomes polarized, with each side framing the debate in terms of fairness, fraud, and constitutional rights.

Hunt criticizes the media for downplaying or dismissing concerns about illegal voting and census manipulation, arguing that they serve partisan interests rather than the public good. An informed citizenry, he insists, must demand honesty and accountability from both the media and political leaders.

The Call for Constitutional and Electoral Reform

The issues raised by Hunt point to the need for reform in how America conducts its elections and census. Ensuring accurate counting, preventing illegal votes, and maintaining the integrity of district maps are essential steps toward restoring public trust.

He advocates for policies that eliminate loopholes, enforce existing laws, and promote transparency. The goal: a system where every legal vote counts equally, and representation reflects the true will of the people.

The Importance of Vigilance and Civic Engagement

Hunt’s passionate speech underscores the importance of vigilance among American citizens. The fight over the census and election laws is ongoing, and public engagement is critical. Citizens must stay informed, demand accountability, and push for reforms that protect the integrity of democracy.

This is not just a political battle; it’s a fight for the very foundation of American sovereignty and fairness. Vigilance, transparency, and adherence to constitutional principles are the tools to preserve the republic.

Conclusion: A Call to Action for America

The confrontation between Wesley Hunt and Jamie Raskin exemplifies the broader struggle over election integrity, constitutional rights, and the future of American democracy. As Hunt boldly exposes the flaws and threats posed by partisan manipulation, he reminds us that the integrity of our electoral system depends on strict enforcement, honesty, and civic responsibility.

Americans must remain vigilant, demanding fair representation, transparent processes, and the protection of voter rights. Only through unwavering commitment to the rule of law and constitutional principles can the nation ensure that every vote truly counts and that democracy endures for generations to come.

.
https://youtu.be/ERg5n486hFo?si=YOqsA6cmzkvsBrSG