🚨”We Have the Documents” – Tom Homan Says Ilhan Omar is UNDER INVESTIGATION for Immigration FRAUD

.
.

Tom Homan Confirms Ilhan Omar Under Investigation for Immigration Fraud: Documents, DNA, and Political Fallout

WASHINGTON, D.C. — A new wave of controversy has swept through the political landscape as former ICE Director Tom Homan confirmed that Congresswoman Ilhan Omar (D-MN) is under federal investigation for alleged immigration fraud. The focus of the probe: persistent accusations that Omar married her brother to help him gain legal entry into the United States. The story, which has circulated for years in conservative media, is now being revisited with renewed urgency as officials say they “have the documents” and are actively reviewing the case.

The Allegations: Marriage, Immigration, and Fraud

The allegation at the heart of the investigation is that Ilhan Omar, a Somali refugee who arrived in the U.S. as a child, married her biological brother in order to facilitate his immigration. This claim first gained traction in 2019, fueled by right-wing outlets and commentators, and has since become a recurring flashpoint in debates over immigration, refugee policy, and political integrity.

According to Homan, investigators are now pulling records and reviewing files, with one of the best fraud investigators in Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) personally involved. “We’re looking into it,” Homan said on Newsmax, “and there’s no doubt he reviewed the files.”

Competing Narratives: Who Came First?

A key point of confusion in the public discourse surrounds the details of the alleged fraud. As highlighted in recent commentary, there are two versions of the story:

Version 1 (Tucker Carlson, New York Post): Omar was already in the United States. She allegedly married her brother so that he could come to the U.S. as her spouse, a violation of immigration law.
Version 2 (Recent Trump Comments): Omar married her brother so that she herself could come to the United States.

Legal analysts and journalists point out that the first version is far more likely, given that Omar arrived in the U.S. as a pre-teen under a refugee program. The implication is that any fraud would have affected her brother’s residency status, not her own.

The DNA Evidence: Private Investigators and Genetic Testing

The investigation has reportedly involved extensive efforts by Republican operatives and private investigators. According to New York Post columnist Miranda Devine, these operatives collected DNA samples from cigarette butts and drinking straws used by Omar and her alleged brother/husband, sending them to a laboratory for analysis. Devine claims the results showed a genetic match consistent with siblings, though the findings have never been independently verified or published in peer-reviewed scientific literature.

The day before the results were set to be released, Anton Lazaro, a Republican donor involved in the investigation, was arrested on unrelated charges. The FBI reportedly declined to pursue the case, citing the statute of limitations and lack of actionable evidence.

Legal Context: What’s at Stake?

Immigration fraud is a serious offense under U.S. law and can be grounds for deportation. However, the ability to strip Omar of her citizenship or congressional seat depends on whether she gained her status through fraud. If she was already a citizen when the alleged marriage occurred, the fraud would primarily affect her brother’s status.

Legal experts explain that if Omar married her brother to help him gain residency, she could face criminal charges and her brother’s citizenship could be revoked. However, her own citizenship is less likely to be affected unless it can be proven that her status was obtained through fraudulent means.

Political Fallout: Trump, Newsmax, and the Somali Community

The renewed investigation comes as President Donald Trump and other conservative leaders intensify their focus on immigration enforcement. Homan stated, “Thank God President Trump’s in the White House. We’re going to look at all of them… there are going to be multiple deportations coming.”

Officials have also cited claims by South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem that nearly 50% of visas in the Somali community are fraudulent—a statistic that, if accurate, would have profound implications for immigration policy and enforcement.

The Somali-American community in Minnesota, the largest in the United States, is now under heightened scrutiny. Community leaders warn that the controversy risks fueling xenophobia and undermining legitimate efforts to address fraud and abuse.

Assimilation, Contribution, and Public Assistance

The debate has also touched on broader questions of assimilation and public assistance. Critics argue that some Somali immigrants have failed to assimilate and rely heavily on government support, while supporters contend that the vast majority are hardworking, law-abiding citizens.

Homan emphasized the importance of self-sufficiency and adherence to the law. “When they come here under legal program, they’re required to be self-sufficient. They have to prove they’re self-sufficient. So, a lot of them, first thing they’re doing to get here is get on the public dole.”

Omar’s Response and Congressional Implications

Ilhan Omar has consistently denied the allegations, calling them politically motivated and rooted in Islamophobia and racism. She has not been formally charged with any crime, and no definitive public evidence has been presented to prove the claims.

The investigation raises questions about Omar’s future in Congress. If fraud is proven, she could face criminal charges and possible removal from office. However, legal experts caution that the burden of proof is high and the statute of limitations may complicate prosecution.

Media Coverage and Public Reaction

The controversy has sparked intense debate across the political spectrum. Conservative commentators have expressed outrage, calling for accountability and suggesting that Omar’s case is emblematic of broader failures in the immigration system. Supporters of Omar have denounced the allegations as a smear campaign, arguing that the persistent focus on her personal life and background reflects a broader effort to undermine progressive women of color in Congress.

The Broader Impact: Immigration, Refugees, and Political Division

The Omar controversy is unfolding against a backdrop of increasing polarization over immigration and refugee policy. Minnesota’s Somali community, the largest in the United States, has faced heightened scrutiny as a result of recent fraud scandals and the persistent allegations against Omar.

Critics argue that the focus on Omar and Somali immigrants risks fueling xenophobia and undermining legitimate efforts to address fraud and abuse. Supporters contend that accountability is necessary to maintain the integrity of the immigration system, but warn against collective punishment and scapegoating.

What Happens Next?

With Tom Homan and federal investigators now actively reviewing Omar’s immigration records, the case may be entering a new phase. Homan has promised a “deep dive” into the files, with the possibility of multiple deportations if fraud is uncovered.

The outcome of the investigation could have significant implications—not only for Omar, but for the broader debate over immigration, refugee policy, and political accountability.

Conclusion: Waiting for Answers

For now, the nation waits. Omar’s critics demand accountability, her supporters decry what they see as a politically motivated witch hunt, and investigators sift through years of records and rumors in search of the truth.

What is clear is that the controversy surrounding Ilhan Omar is far from over. Whether the investigation yields new evidence or simply reignites old debates, its outcome will shape not only the future of one congresswoman, but the ongoing struggle over immigration, identity, and democracy in America.

.