Voters Abandon Comrade Mamdani? New Poll Reveals Hidden Support Hits Record Low

.
.

VOTERS ABANDON COMRADE MAMDANI? New Poll Reveals Hidden Support Hits Record Low

 

NEW YORK, N.Y. – The campaign of Democratic Socialist mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani is reportedly facing an unprecedented implosion, with his odds of winning collapsing amid mounting legal and ethical challenges. Mamdani, who is running for mayor of New York City, is being heavily scrutinized for alleged violations of federal election laws regarding foreign campaign contributions.

The controversy, fueled by reports from Fox News and the New York Post, suggests Mamdani’s political rise has stalled, with betting markets now showing a sharp decline in his projected victory.

THE LEGAL HURDLE: FOREIGN DONATION ALLEGATIONS

 

The core issue threatening Mamdani’s campaign stems from allegations of illegal foreign campaign donations, a direct violation of federal election laws.

 

1. Criminal Referrals and DOJ Concern

 

Mamdani is reportedly facing criminal referrals to the Department of Justice (DOJ) over concerns about foreign donations made to his New York City mayoral campaign.

The Violation: If found guilty of accepting foreign contributions, Mamdani would be in clear violation of election laws.
The Context: The reports have noted that Mamdani, who is described as a recently naturalized U.S. citizen (approximately seven years ago), has aggressively pursued the political sphere, making the alleged violation particularly problematic.

The increasing scrutiny, which has been front-page news, raises serious questions about Mamdani’s ability to proceed to Election Day, despite his previous strength in the polls.

 

THE COLLAPSE OF ODDS: BETTING MARKETS REACT

 

In the absence of universally accepted polling data, political betting markets often provide a strong indicator of perceived political momentum. Mamdani’s performance in these markets has been dire.

 

1. Poly Market Numbers Cratering

 

Reports from the betting platform Poly Market show Mamdani’s odds collapsing.

Indicator of Reality: These markets, driven by global bettors putting money behind their beliefs, have historically been accurate predictors of political outcomes. The sharp drop in Mamdani’s perceived chances suggests widespread internal doubt about his viability as a candidate.

This decline is contrasted with the continued political success of figures like Donald J. Trump, whose odds were seen to be climbing even as other rivals’ numbers cratered in similar betting markets.

 

THE IDEOLOGICAL WARFARE: LYING AND VICTIMHOOD

 

Mamdani, who is positioned as a radical socialist, has consistently relied on a narrative of political victimhood, which critics argue is based on outright lies.

 

1. The Aunt’s Fabricated Story

 

Mamdani was heavily scrutinized for lying about his family history to bolster his claims of systemic Islamophobia:

The Lie: Mamdani claimed his “aunt” was so worried about her hijab that she “stopped taking the subway after September 11th.”
The Truth: It was revealed that the woman Mamdani was referring to was actually his father’s cousin, not his aunt, and that she did not even live in New York City during the post- period, having lived in Tanzania from 2000 to 2003.

When confronted, Mamdani was forced to admit the relationship was that of a cousin but insisted that he referred to her as “aunt” growing up, a defense critics dismissed as a further evasion of the truth.

 

2. Weaponizing Islamophobia

 

Mamdani is accused of creating a politically charged environment by misusing the term “Islamophobia,” which critics argue is a phrase created by fascists and used by cowards to manipulate.

The Purpose: By fabricating personal stories and creating energy around the term, Mamdani’s strategy is to make it seem that he and, by extension, all Muslims are victims, thereby justifying the granting of more political power.
The Contradiction: Critics point to the fact that while Mamdami champions these views, he allies himself with individuals with ties to extremist views, and his own politics align with authoritarian regimes that oppress minorities.

 

THE GREATER POLITICAL CONTEXT: THE CHOICE OF DECLINE

 

The Mamdani campaign failure is seen as a cautionary tale about the consequences of unchecked radicalism, particularly in major cities.

The Socialist Failure: Critics argue that socialism and communism, ideologies Mamdani openly supports, have never worked anywhere in the world and are fundamentally at odds with liberal values and freedom.
The Consequences of Decline: The push for radical policies is seen as directly causing urban decay, driving out the middle and upper classes, and leading to the city’s eventual destruction. Governor Ron DeSantis of Florida, often cited as a political counterpoint, continuously warns that decline is a choice made by bad governance.

The ongoing political drama surrounding Mamdani is not just a local election story but a crucial test of whether voters will choose radical chaos or return to the principles of freedom and common-sense governance.

.