Bombshell Docs Reveal Jack Smith KNEW Trump Was Innocent, Charged Him Anyway

.
.

🚨 Bombshell Docs Reveal Jack Smith KNEW Trump Was Innocent, Charged Him Anyway: DOJ Memo Exonerates Alternate Electors

The foundation of Special Counsel Jack Smith’s high-stakes federal prosecution against Donald Trump—specifically concerning the challenge to the 2020 election results and the organization of alternate slates of electors—has been fundamentally undermined by bombshell revelations indicating the Department of Justice (DOJ) knew the actions were not illegal all along.

The exposé centers on internal legal conclusions reached by state-level Departments of Justice—even those led by Democrats—which explicitly stated that the act of organizing alternate slates of electors did not constitute a violation of state law. Despite this knowledge, Smith moved forward with a prosecution built on the premise that Trump “pursued unlawful means.”

Critics are now calling for a swift investigation by the incoming Trump Justice Department into what they characterize as an unlawful act of election interference orchestrated by a politically motivated special counsel.

The Wisconsin DOJ Memo: A Legal Exoneration

The most damning evidence comes from the state of Wisconsin, a pivotal swing state where Donald Trump’s campaign challenged the election results and organized a slate of electors who sought a review of the outcome.

According to internal documentation, the Wisconsin Department of Justice (DOJ)—led by the state’s Democratic Attorney General—issued a lengthy memo in early 2022 that delivered a crucial legal conclusion regarding the alternate electors.

The memo concluded that:

Wisconsin law does not prohibit an alternate set of electors from meeting.

The complaint against the Republican electors did “not raise a reasonable suspicion” that the alternate electors had violated Wisconsin law.

The Wisconsin DOJ’s conclusion was based upon “the text of the relevant statutes and in light of the facts, historical precedent, and related federal authorities.” This finding directly countered the prevailing media narrative—and the future claims of Jack Smith—that the “alternate electors” were inherently “fake” or “illegal.”

The memo essentially confirmed that the Trump campaign was exercising a legal right to challenge the election and ensure that alternate mechanisms for resolving electoral disputes remained available, should the courts rule in their favor.

The Smith Prosecution: Ignoring the Rule of Law

Special Counsel Jack Smith brought federal charges against Donald Trump in the summer of 2023, followed by superseding charges, based on the contention that Trump “pursued unlawful means of discounting legitimate votes.”

The revelation of the Wisconsin DOJ’s internal legal conclusion indicates that Smith proceeded with his prosecution despite the existence of legal opinions within the broader justice system confirming the legality of the alternate elector process.

This discrepancy has led critics to argue that Smith’s investigation was not driven by the rule of law, but by a partisan agenda:

Political Hatchet Man: Smith is accused of acting as a political operative selected by the radical Democratic party to interfere directly in the 2024 election cycle.

Fabricated Narrative: By charging Trump with pursuing “unlawful means,” Smith knowingly fabricated a narrative of criminality around actions that were fundamentally legal challenges and mechanisms available within the US constitutional system.

Ignoring Legal Precedent: Smith is accused of ignoring the well-established legal right of a presidential candidate to object to election results and to organize alternate slates of electors—a right that has historical precedent in American elections.

The implication is severe: that the prosecution was a strategic, high-level maneuver designed to inflict maximum political damage on a leading presidential candidate, independent of the underlying legal facts.

Call for Accountability: The Trump DOJ’s Mandate

With the failure of the election interference efforts and the successful re-election of Donald Trump, commentators are now demanding that the incoming Justice Department take aggressive action to investigate the unlawful conduct of Jack Smith and his team.

Critics argue that the integrity of democratic elections in the United States requires an immediate and thorough review of the special counsel’s actions.

The mandate for the incoming Trump Justice Department includes:

Criminal Conspiracy Charges: Taking a hard look at whether Jack Smith and his team engaged in election interference, criminal conspiracy, or other charges that fit the bill.

Protection of Democratic Elections: Ensuring that federal law enforcement agencies are not used as partisan tools to interfere in future elections, including 2028.

Immediate Action: The call is for the Trump Justice Department to move immediately to investigate these insidious and unlawful actions and not wait for the next election cycle to bring charges against those who violated the law.

The discovery that the DOJ possessed information—namely the memo concluding the alternate elector process was “not illegal”—which directly undermined the core of Smith’s case transforms the prosecution from a legal dispute into a devastating indictment of the political weaponization of the justice system. The focus has irrevocably shifted from whether Donald Trump acted unlawfully to whether Jack Smith and the radical political establishment acted unlawfully in attempting to derail a presidential campaign.

.