Judge Threatens to Kick P. Diddy Out of Court for ‘Nodding Vigorously’ at Jurors

In a dramatic turn of events during the ongoing trial of Sean “P. Diddy” Combs, Judge Arun Subermanian issued a stern warning to the hip-hop mogul for allegedly nodding vigorously at jurors. This incident has raised concerns about potential jury intimidation and the integrity of the trial process.

Cross-Examination Highlights

Elizabeth Milner, an in-court reporter covering the trial, provided insights into the day’s proceedings, particularly the cross-examination of Briana Bengal. During her testimony, Bengal faced intense questioning from defense attorney Nicole West Morland, who aimed to undermine her credibility. Milner noted that despite the aggressive questioning, Bengal managed to maintain her composure, often responding with “I don’t remember” when pressed on specific details.

The defense’s strategy included presenting Diddy’s hotel receipts from September 2016, which contradicted Bengal’s timeline of events. This tactic aimed to cast doubt on her recollection of the alleged incident, suggesting that Diddy was not present when the injuries occurred.

Jurors’ Reactions

Milner observed the jurors closely, noting their engagement and reactions during the testimony. While some jurors appeared to be taking notes, there were signs of fatigue due to the repetitive nature of the allegations being presented. The judge’s warning to Diddy about his behavior in court came as a response to concerns that his actions might influence the jurors’ perceptions.

Diddy’s Courtroom Presence

Throughout the trial, Diddy has been an active participant in his defense, often seen taking notes and reacting visibly to witness testimonies. However, his behavior has drawn scrutiny. Judge Subermanian’s warning highlighted the importance of maintaining decorum in the courtroom to ensure a fair trial. The judge indicated that if Diddy continued to nod at jurors, he might impose restrictions, including potentially barring him from the courtroom.

Support from Family and Friends

Diddy’s family presence in the courtroom has varied throughout the trial. Initially, many of his children attended, but attendance has dwindled over time. However, key supporters, including his mother and close friends, have remained consistent in their courtroom presence, demonstrating solidarity during this challenging period.

💬 Other people who read this also checked out 👀👇

2
P. Diddy on Trial: 9 Bombshell Moments That Could Lock Up Rapper for Life
15
P. Diddy on Trial: Death Threats, Freaky Social Posts & No Sleep — Week 3
37
Diddy Just ATTACKED Cassie In Court After She LEAKED New Footage! THIS IS HUGE!
74
Diddy COLLAPSES in Court After Judge Mentions Possible Life Sentence | Courtroom CHAOS

Press and Public Interest

The trial has attracted significant media attention, with reporters eager to cover the proceedings. However, there have been tensions regarding access to certain exhibits, particularly those involving sensitive information about witnesses. The court has placed restrictions on the release of these materials to protect the identities of individuals involved in the case.

Conclusion

As the trial continues, the dynamics in the courtroom remain complex, with issues of credibility, juror influence, and media access at the forefront. The judge’s admonition to Diddy serves as a reminder of the delicate balance required in high-profile cases, where public interest and the pursuit of justice must coexist. As the proceedings unfold, all eyes will remain on the courtroom to see how these developments impact the trial’s outcome.

 

Play video: