Empathy vs. Tradition: Patrick Bet-David and Andrew Schulz Clash Over Parenting, Trans Kids, and Woke Ideology

Few debates today are as raw, personal, and divisive as the one about parenting in the age of “woke” ideology—especially when it comes to trans kids. On the latest PBD Podcast, host Patrick Bet-David and comedian Andrew Schulz took on this explosive topic, delivering a conversation that was as honest as it was heated.

Can Empathy and Tradition Coexist?

Andrew Schulz opens the discussion by advocating for empathy. “I believe in trans. I want kids to feel comfortable if they do,” he says. But he doesn’t stop there—he asks the hard questions. What does empathy look like for parents who are struggling with their child’s transition? What do we fail to understand about their pain, their confusion, and their journey?

Patrick Bet-David, never one to shy away from controversy, pushes back. “Both sides care about kids,” he admits, but then wonders aloud if the right actually cares more. He’s not convinced the left is prioritizing children’s welfare over ideology. “Shouldn’t the focus be on protecting our children, not appeasing progressive ideologies?” Patrick asks, striking at the heart of the debate.

Real Stories, Real Pain

The conversation gets personal. Patrick shares the story of a father, devastated and confused, who learns at dinner that his child is transitioning. The pain is palpable, and Patrick’s empathy for the parent is real. But he draws a line: “That doesn’t justify me having to call you a man,” he says, emphasizing his belief in traditional definitions.

Schulz, meanwhile, brings up empathy for trans parents and kids. He points out that many parents and children face immense emotional challenges, often misunderstood by society. He references Chelsea Handler’s childhood trauma and how it shaped her worldview, arguing that compassion and understanding are vital, even if we disagree.

Is It All Just Peer Pressure?

Patrick isn’t convinced that every case is about genuine identity. He points to Hollywood, where it sometimes seems like having a trans child is a trend—a competition for acceptance. He worries that social pressure, not personal conviction, is driving decisions in some families.

Education or Indoctrination?

The debate spills into schools. Patrick warns against “indoctrinating children,” arguing that kids should be protected from powerful ideological influences. Schulz counters, saying there’s a difference between education and brainwashing. He believes schools should teach empathy and understanding, helping kids become more inclusive from a young age.

The Chess Match of Parenting

Both men stand firm. Patrick insists that fundamental values and children’s safety must come before adapting to shifting social norms. Andrew argues that empathy and inclusivity are the keys to a harmonious society. They’re playing chess with the future of parenting, each move revealing deeper complexities.

The Big Question: Where Do We Go From Here?

The clash between empathy and tradition is the defining debate of our time. Should we prioritize safety and stability, or embrace empathy and inclusivity? Is it possible to do both?

Your Turn

What do you think? Is Patrick right to stress traditional values and parental authority? Or does Andrew have a point about the importance of empathy and acceptance in raising the next generation? Share your thoughts below—this is a conversation that matters.

If you’re tired of echo chambers and want honest, nuanced content, subscribe and join the debate. The future of parenting—and society—might depend on it.