Zohran Mamdani Under Fire: Media Turns on Progressive Star Amid Lying Scandal

The New York City mayoral race was already the most closely watched local contest in the country, but this week, the campaign was rocked by a scandal that has thrown Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani’s progressive candidacy into chaos. As major media outlets pivot from their previously favorable coverage, Mamdani is being forced to answer for a series of statements about his family and Islamophobia that now appear to be false, igniting a nationwide debate about honesty, victimhood, and the politics of identity.

The Lie That Sparked the Firestorm

It started with a speech. Mamdani, a self-described champion of immigrant rights and working-class New Yorkers, delivered a passionate address outside a mosque, recounting how his “aunt” stopped riding the subway after 9/11 because she felt unsafe in her hijab. The story was meant to highlight the real consequences of Islamophobia in America’s largest city, and it quickly became a rallying point for his campaign.

But within hours, journalists began to dig. The woman Mamdani referenced, it turned out, does not wear a hijab. She is also not his aunt, but rather his father’s cousin. And, most damningly, she did not even live in New York City during the period in question—she resided in Tanzania from 2000 to 2003.

When confronted by reporters, Mamdani doubled down, insisting, “My father’s cousin is my aunt. That’s how I referred to her growing up my whole life.” The media, which had previously given Mamdani glowing coverage, seized on the discrepancy. Headlines blared: Zohran Mamdani Forced to Explain Why He Lied as Media Turns on Him.

.

.

.

A Victimhood Narrative Unravels

For years, Mamdani has built his political brand on speaking out against bigotry and positioning himself as a voice for the marginalized. But the unraveling of his subway story exposed a deeper issue: the use of personal anecdotes to create a narrative of victimhood.

As the news cycle intensified, Mamdani continued to frame the controversy as a distraction orchestrated by his political opponents. “For the takeaway from my more than 10-minute address about Islamophobia in this race and in this city to be the question of my aunt tells you everything about Andrew Cuomo and his inability to reckon with a crisis of his own,” he said, trying to deflect criticism.

Yet, the facts remained. The woman was not his aunt, did not wear a hijab, and did not live in New York City during 9/11. The media’s patience wore thin, and commentators from across the spectrum began to question Mamdani’s credibility.

Media Shifts: From Cheerleader to Watchdog

The change in tone from the press was stark. Outlets that once celebrated Mamdani’s progressive stances now scrutinized his every word. The New York Post published a detailed exposé, while national commentators dissected his statements on cable news.

Dave Rubin, host of The Rubin Report, summed up the mood: “It’s so consistent with these guys. They make up things. He wanted to make up stories so that his aunt and he and by extension Muslims were the victims of 9/11.” Rubin, himself a New Yorker during 9/11, added, “My cousin was a firefighter who went there. I assure you that Zorhan Mamdani and his aunt were not the victim during 9/11.”

The controversy became a litmus test for the broader issue of truth in politics. “He just can’t tell the truth,” Rubin continued, “but what this really is about is the desire for victimhood.”

Islamophobia and the Politics of Fear

The scandal also reignited debate over the term “Islamophobia.” Mamdani, in his defense, cited threats and harassment he had received, reading out messages like “the only good Muslim is a dead Muslim.” He argued that the focus on his family story was a distraction from real issues of hate and discrimination.

Yet critics, including Rubin, challenged the very premise. Quoting Christopher Hitchens, Rubin argued that “Islamophobia is a word created by fascists and used by cowards to manipulate morons.” He continued, “Islam is a radical religion. It does not mean that every Muslim is radical obviously, but everywhere that Islam takes root is bad for liberal values.”

This hardline rhetoric found a receptive audience among those skeptical of Mamdani’s narrative, further polarizing the debate.

The Broader Political Landscape: Lies and Leadership

Mamdani’s troubles were not happening in a vacuum. The week saw a series of revelations about other prominent Democrats, including California Governor Gavin Newsom. Newsom was caught embellishing his “hoop dreams” childhood, claiming he grew up poor despite well-documented ties to billionaire families.

The pattern was clear: politicians caught in lies, doubling down, and then facing a skeptical media. Jordan Peterson, the renowned psychologist, appeared on Rubin’s show to explain the phenomenon: “The psychopath either can’t or won’t learn from experience. Psychopaths have no compassion, but they don’t learn from experience either.”

Rubin drew a direct line between Mamdani, Newsom, and the broader culture of dishonesty: “When you hear Zorhan lie and then get caught in the lie and then lie again… Everything is basically for the purpose of now. It’s just for the purpose of right now. What will accomplish the goal of right now more than anything else? So you lie. You get caught in the lie and then you lie again and you do it again and again and again.”

Identity Politics and the DEI Debate

The controversy also touched on the role of identity in politics. Karine Jean-Pierre, the former White House press secretary, was criticized for emphasizing her identity—“I woke up every day as a black woman who is queer”—over her job performance. Critics argued that diversity initiatives (DEI) were being used as a shield for incompetence.

Michelle Obama weighed in on the topic of black women’s hair, describing the time and money spent straightening it as a form of oppression. Rubin responded, “So don’t do it if you don’t want to. Don’t straighten your hair or do straighten it, but stop making it seem like that makes you a victim.”

The Stakes for New York City

As the mayoral race heads into its final days, the stakes could not be higher. Mamdani’s opponents, including Andrew Cuomo and Curtis Sliwa, have seized on the scandal to paint him as untrustworthy and out of touch. Sliwa, a former leader of the Guardian Angels, is running as the law-and-order candidate, warning that Mamdani’s policies would lead to “communist collapse” in America’s largest city.

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis weighed in, contrasting New York’s decline with Florida’s flourishing. “He is so far left and he mixes his leftism with Islamism. He’s going to make the De Blasio years look like the golden age.”

The Exodus and the Future

The fallout from the scandal is already being felt. Analysts predict a “giant population transfer” as upper-income and middle-class New Yorkers flee the city, citing crime, high taxes, and political instability. “Decline is a choice,” Rubin said, quoting DeSantis. “When you choose leftism, when you choose to not police properly, when you choose to care about all sorts of things except the people who live in your city, you can destroy your city.”

Conclusion: Truth, Leadership, and the Road Ahead

The Mamdani scandal is more than a local controversy—it is a microcosm of the national debate over honesty, identity, and the future of American politics. As the media turns from cheerleader to watchdog, and as voters demand answers, the mayoral race in New York City has become a referendum on what kind of leadership the country wants.

In an era of viral sound bites and social media outrage, the truth still matters. And as Mamdani faces the consequences of his words, the nation watches closely, knowing that the outcome in New York may foreshadow the battles to come in 2028 and beyond.