Nancy Pelosi Tries to HUMILIATES Kash Patel, You Won’t BELIEVE What Happens Next – She’s DONE!

.
.

🎤 TOTAL ANNIHILATION: Kash Patel Exposes Jaime Raskin’s Legacy of Neglect and Political Exploitation

The House Judiciary Committee hearing intended to scrutinize FBI Director Kash Patel devolved into the systematic, public dismantling of Congressman Jaime Raskin’s moral authority and career. Raskin, the constitutional law professor and lead prosecutor of Donald Trump’s impeachment, was utterly unprepared for the evidence Patel presented, which documented years of Raskin’s alleged neglect of his working-class constituents and the cynical exploitation of the January 6th tragedy for personal profit.

The confrontation quickly went viral, exposing Raskin’s hypocrisy and turning the moral voice of the Democratic caucus into a symbol of Washington’s transactional rot.

I. The Core Accusation: Neglect of Duty and Prioritization of Wealth

Patel’s opening salvo immediately bypassed the FBI’s operational issues and targeted Raskin’s ethical conduct as a representative of Maryland’s 8th Congressional District. Patel demonstrated that Raskin consistently ignored his low-income constituents while prioritizing wealthy donors and a lucrative media career.

The Tale of Two Constituents

Patel used meticulous documentation—FOIA requests and correspondence logs—to illustrate Raskin’s betrayal of the most vulnerable members of his district:

The Morrison Family (Bethesda): Wealthy donors who contributed significantly to Raskin’s campaign. When they needed help with a zoning permit for their neighborhood pool house, Raskin personally responded in 48 hours, calling the county zoning board to ensure the permit was approved in a week.
The Jackson Family (Wheaton): Marcus Jackson, a third-generation Black auto shop owner in a low-income area, wrote Raskin seven times over 18 months pleading for help with community policing and security grants after his shop was robbed five times, leading to a brutal beating. Raskin was too busy for a response.

The Outcome: Marcus Jackson’s auto repair shop closed its doors forever. Raskin’s office never sent a response, not even a form letter.
The Prioritization: Patel revealed that Raskin’s office responded to three requests from wealthy Bethesda constituents about a pool house while simultaneously ignoring Mr. Jackson’s pleas for help against violent crime.

Patel’s voice hardened: “A pool house got more attention than a man whose life’s work was being destroyed by violent crime. Can you explain that prioritization, Congressman, because I’m having trouble understanding it through the lens of equal representation?”

The Donor-Driven Schedule

Patel showed Raskin’s public schedule for 2024, revealing that 93% of his constituent events were held in areas where the median home value exceeds $1 million, while only 7% were held in working-class areas.

“You called me Gestapo, Congressman,” Patel stated, using Raskin’s earlier insult. “You questioned my conscience. But when’s the last time you looked in a mirror and measured your own conduct against the standards you demand from others?”

II. The Corruption of Tragedy: The January 6th Payday

Raskin, attempting to regain control, brought up the January 6th investigation, the project he considered his “crown jewel” and moral legacy. Patel, however, opened his thickest folder, the one labeled “J6C,” to expose the true motive behind the investigation’s televised drama.

The Book Deal and the Editorial Agenda

Patel revealed that Raskin had allegedly seen the national tragedy as a massive personal payday.

The Advance: Patel presented an email from Raskin’s literary agent, dated before January 6th, stating: “Major opportunity coming. Jaime will have access to exclusive materials from the upcoming Capital Riot investigation. We should plan for a big book—think All the President’s Men level advance.” Raskin received a $3.7 million advance for his book, Democracy on Trial.
Narrative Over Truth: Patel produced emails between Raskin and his publisher explicitly discussing coordinating his questioning in the hearings to “build dramatic beats for the book narrative” and ensure the hearings lasted at least six months for “maximum publicity.”
The Summation: “You delayed hearings. You stretched out testimony. You orchestrated dramatic moments not for truth or justice, but for chapter breaks.” Patel summarized that Raskin made approximately $5.4 million from his January 6th-themed books and media contracts.

Suppressing the Truth

Worse than profiting from the tragedy, Patel revealed that Raskin’s committee allegedly suppressed testimony that contradicted the narrative of singular culpability, prioritizing their political case over the “whole truth.”

The Suppressed Testimony: Patel produced a declassified document containing testimony from former Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund, who explicitly stated he requested National Guard backup three times before January 6th, but the requests were denied by House leadership. This was not in Raskin’s public report.
Editing the Victims: Patel brought Officer Michael Fanone—a hero of January 6th who suffered a heart attack on the steps—to the hearing. Fanone testified that Raskin’s committee edited his testimony to remove his criticism of both parties for turning the event into “political ammunition” and removing the parts where he criticized the denial of security.
The Final Email: Patel produced an email from Raskin’s congressional account that read: “Cut the security discussion from this testimony. We need focus on Trump’s rally. Can we edit this video? The witness is too equivocating.”

Patel concluded: “You saw a national tragedy and thought, book deal. You edited truth to create drama. You manipulated testimony to maximize sales.”

III. The Inevitable Reckoning

The systematic demolition of Raskin’s credibility was total. A former student of Raskin’s stood up in the gallery, testifying that Raskin had exploited students for 200 hours of unpaid labor on his book, all for “three credit hours.”

The climax of the hearing saw the motion pass for an immediate investigation into the conduct of the January 6th committee. Raskin’s signature achievement was about to be investigated itself.

Raskin, having built his career on moral authority, now watched his legacy crumble under the weight of his own documented ethical failures.

.