The Chicago Sky Just THREW Angel Reese UNDER THE BUS For Caitlin Clark – THIS is HUGE!

In the heart of the WNBA’s ongoing evolution, a controversial decision by the Chicago Sky has sparked a wave of frustration and bewilderment, particularly from one of its star players, Angel Reese. The decision to move only Caitlin Clark’s games to the United Center, the largest arena in Chicago, has set the stage for a showdown between the two athletes, with Reese publicly voicing her dissatisfaction. For Reese, this decision feels like a blatant disregard for her contributions to the league and her star power, while for the Chicago Sky, it’s a cold, hard business move.

It all started when the Chicago Sky announced that they would move just two of their home games for the 2025 season to the United Center. While this may seem like a routine scheduling change, it’s what’s behind the decision that has caught everyone’s attention. Both games just so happen to be against the Indiana Fever, the team that features Caitlin Clark. The United Center, which seats 21,000 fans, offers far more space than Wintrust Arena, the Sky’s typical home venue, which holds just over 10,000 seats. The move to a bigger arena signals something larger than just a scheduling shift—it’s a sign that the WNBA and its teams are prioritizing financial gain over anything else.

Angel Reese, who has played an instrumental role in the growth of the WNBA, quickly realized the message this move sent. Despite her achievements on the court, including her viral TikTok presence and dominance in rebounding, her games never received the same venue upgrades. As the league grows and fan demand continues to rise, it’s clear that the business side of things is taking precedence. Caitlin Clark, the 2024 WNBA Rookie of the Year, has become a box office sensation. Her presence on the court has led to sellout crowds, with some games drawing record attendance figures. Her impact on the league cannot be overstated—Clark single-handedly revolutionized fan engagement in women’s basketball.

This isn’t simply a matter of favoritism, but rather the undeniable economic reality of professional sports. Caitlin Clark’s games consistently sell out, leading teams to scramble to book bigger arenas. The United Center, with its 21,000-seat capacity, is the ideal venue to host Clark’s games. In fact, when the Indiana Fever visited Chicago in 2024, the crowds reached record-breaking numbers. The arena was packed to the brim, and it wasn’t just about filling the seats—it was about the business potential Clark brought with her. Her presence in a city like Chicago, with its strong basketball culture, has become a financial goldmine for the league. It is no surprise that her games are now being moved to the United Center, with many fans eagerly anticipating her return to the Windy City.

However, for Angel Reese, this new reality stings. She has made it clear that she too believes she deserves this level of attention. “They watch for me too,” she said, expressing her frustration that her game didn’t get the same level of respect and attention as Clark’s. But the numbers tell a different story. While Reese’s games last season averaged around 9,000 fans, Clark’s games were filling stadiums at a much higher rate, routinely drawing crowds of nearly 17,000. The divide between their star power is glaring, and it’s something Reese can’t ignore. The decision to move only Clark’s games to a larger venue is a reflection of market demand, not personal bias.

The truth of the matter is simple: Caitlin Clark is the WNBA’s current face of growth. When she steps onto the court, the ticket demand spikes, merchandise flies off the shelves, and the atmosphere in the arena electrifies. Teams are following the money, and it’s no coincidence that the larger arenas are being reserved for her. This isn’t about playing favorites—this is economics at work. The WNBA is a professional league that, like any other, needs to capitalize on the players who bring in the revenue. In this case, that player is Caitlin Clark, not Angel Reese.

As the Chicago Sky made the announcement about the venue changes, many fans took to social media to voice their opinions, creating an online frenzy. Some saw the decision as a clear acknowledgment of Clark’s commercial value, while others felt it was a slap in the face to Reese. There was a divide in the fan base, with some defending Reese and others embracing the business move, but the numbers continued to paint a clear picture: Caitlin Clark is putting butts in seats, and the WNBA is taking full advantage of that.

This situation highlights an ongoing issue in women’s basketball. While Reese undeniably has a following, her star power has yet to match that of Clark’s. This is a crucial moment for Reese—she has the talent, the personality, and the platform, but she’s faced with the harsh reality that success in professional sports isn’t just about talent—it’s about drawing in the fans. Fans want to see Clark play, and it’s no secret that wherever Clark goes, so do the crowds.

Reese’s efforts to position herself as Clark’s equal in terms of marketability have been loud and frequent. She has marketed herself as the face of the WNBA, claiming that she too is driving the attention toward the sport. However, when it comes down to attendance and ticket sales, the reality is stark—Clark is the one filling up stadiums, not Reese. This disparity in fan engagement is becoming more and more evident with every arena upgrade, with the WNBA’s decision-makers opting to prioritize Clark’s matchups, even at the expense of other talented players like Reese.

The debate over Clark and Reese’s relative star power is more than just a matter of who is the best player—it’s a question of who has the ability to market the game to the masses. Clark’s presence alone has been responsible for a massive spike in viewership and attendance, while Reese’s games are failing to ignite the same level of excitement. It’s a tough pill for Reese and her fans to swallow, but the truth is there for all to see.

In the end, the WNBA is a league that needs to grow, and to do that, it must cater to the players who are attracting the largest audiences. The reality is that Caitlin Clark, at this point in her career, is simply a bigger draw than Angel Reese. It’s not a knock on Reese’s talent—it’s just a matter of marketability. And while Reese may be frustrated by the lack of venue upgrades for her games, she should take this as a call to action. The league isn’t going to bend to her demands because of her star status—it’s going to respond to the numbers.

In the battle for WNBA supremacy, the scoreboard doesn’t lie. The numbers tell the story, and right now, Caitlin Clark is the clear winner in the battle for the fans.