GOP CongressMan Pete Stauber EXPLODES On Democrat Gov. Tim Walz! Exposes His LIES & STOLEN Valour

The Assault on Accountability: A Governor’s Evasion Under Fire

The hearing room confrontation between Republican Congressman Pete Stauber and Governor Tim Walz was less a political hearing and more a surgical, unsparing demolition of a politician’s selective memory and perceived moral inconsistencies. Stauber, a former law enforcement officer, weaponized facts and historical context to expose what he viewed as the Governor’s casual hypocrisy regarding police, public safety, and military service. The exchange was a masterclass in aggressive political questioning, leaving Walz repeatedly cornered and reliant on transparent evasion.

🚨 The Gestapo Rhetoric and the Public Safety Crisis

Stauber’s opening salvo immediately targeted the core weakness of Walz’s public image: his inflammatory rhetoric concerning law enforcement.

The Congressman pressed Walz on his prior statement at a Minnesota law school, where he compared the enforcement of illegal immigrants to a “modern-day Gestapo.” This comparison, which Walz refused to rescind, was immediately juxtaposed with real-world law enforcement victories:

The Al-Shabaab Terrorist and Child Predators: Stauber delivered the knockout blow by asking if the officers who arrested a violent Al-Shabaab terrorist and three illegal immigrant child predators were the Nazis or the Gestapo. Walz’s attempt to deflect to “the tactics of wearing masks” failed spectacularly, as Stauber hammered the point that the Governor’s rhetoric effectively vilifies the very officers performing life-saving public safety work.

The Meth Bust Evasion: Stauber then exposed Walz’s apparent indifference to federal-state cooperation. He confirmed that Minnesota officers had taken 900 pounds of meth off the streets, and when Walz praised the victory, Stauber revealed that ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) had assisted in the arrests. Walz immediately pleaded ignorance, claiming he “was not included in the briefing,” a convenient memory lapse that allowed him to avoid endorsing the federal agency he had previously compared to a fascist secret police.

This sequence meticulously framed Walz as a leader who prioritizes political signaling (condemning ICE) over public safety outcomes (applauding drug busts facilitated by ICE).

💥 The ‘Stolen Valor’ and Military Record

The hearing devolved into a chaotic “meltdown” when Stauber attacked the most sacred ground: Walz’s military service record. After questioning Walz about his failure to contain the 2020 Minneapolis riots (which Walz himself had called an “abject failure”), Stauber moved to the highly charged topic of “stolen valor.”

The Lie About Weapons: Stauber repeatedly challenged Walz: “What weapons did you carry in war?” Walz’s hesitation and inability to answer led Stauber to accuse him of lying to Minnesotans by claiming he “carried weapons in war,” a charge Stauber connected to the respect owed to veterans, referencing his own wife who is an Iraq War veteran.

The Rank Discrepancy: The attack intensified with the physical evidence of a challenge coin. Stauber presented the coin, which allegedly stated Walz retired as a Command Sergeant Major, and contrasted it with Walz’s sworn testimony that he retired as a Master Sergeant (E-8). This discrepancy—a claim of a higher, more prestigious rank than the one officially held upon retirement—was presented as the final, damning piece of evidence that Walz had exaggerated his service history, leading to an eruption of objections and shouting in the chamber.

🛑 The Political Consequences of Incendiary Speech

Stauber closed by bringing the argument full circle to its political impact, reminding Walz of his previous comments labeling Trump supporters “Nazis and fascists.” This history of inflammatory, anti-police, and anti-conservative rhetoric, Stauber asserted, was precisely why the Minnesota Police and Peace Officers Association (MPPOA) did not support Walz in his last election—a significant rejection from the state’s law enforcement community.

The entire exchange highlighted Walz’s strategy of deflection and denial. Whether it was attempting to describe the 2020 riot footage as anything but a “criminal act,” attempting to justify the Gestapo slur, or evading questions about his military past, Walz appeared incapable of offering a direct, responsible, or accountable answer. Stauber’s closing jab—on behalf of the “land of rocks and cows”—summarized the sentiment: the common-sense, working people of Minnesota were disgusted with a Governor whose political ambitions and rhetoric consistently appeared to outweigh his respect for law enforcement, military truth, and basic accountability.