Jerry Jeudy PUTS Kevin Stefanski IN HIS PLACE For SNUBBING Shedeur Sanders As QB2! THIS IS HUGE!

Locker Room Revolt: Judy and Garrett Rip Stefanski as Browns QB Stalling Hits Crisis Point

The chaos in Cleveland has moved past the front office firings and now resides squarely in the locker room. Head Coach Kevin Stefanski’s ongoing refusal to name Shadur Sanders the starting quarterback—or even the clear QB2—has triggered an internal revolt, forcing the team’s biggest stars to go public with their support for the rookie.

This is no longer a conversation about development. It’s a crisis of confidence, and the players are clearly siding against the coach.

The Locker Room Verdict: Stars Demand the Start

The most damning criticism against Stefanski’s decision-making is coming directly from the players he’s counting on to win.

Jerry Judy did not mince words, expressing open confusion over the team’s reluctance to unleash Sanders. He emphasized that Sanders has been fully committed to the team since OTAs, showing up day in and day out, and has “earned his trust.” Judy’s endorsement isn’t just personal; it’s a veteran wide receiver vouching for the arm and mindset of his potential quarterback.

The vote of confidence was further cemented by defensive cornerstone Myles Garrett. Garrett praised Sanders’ dedication and maturity, highlighting a work ethic so rare that the rookie consistently arrives at the facility before anyone else.

“The time he takes… you know, almost every morning you see him in there, you know, talking through plays, talking through schemes with coach and making sure that he’s ready for you know his moment when he gets called up.” — Myles Garrett on Shadur Sanders

In short, the leaders in the locker room believe Sanders is acting like a professional, deserving of the chance he earned through competition.

The Flimsy Logic of Stefanski’s Stalling

Despite this overwhelming internal validation, Stefanski continues to hide behind the thin veil of caution and risk management.

The coach has repeatedly cited Sanders’ youth and inexperience as the primary reasons for keeping him sidelined. However, this logic is falling flat against reality:

Contradictory Policy: If the team is so concerned about rushing young talent, why was a player like running back Quinnshawn Judkins, who lacked a full training camp, given an opportunity to perform? The team’s willingness to risk Judkins while shielding Sanders points to an organizational bias, not a universal development plan.
External Critique: ESPN’s Dan Orlovsky publicly slammed the organization, calling the failure to name Sanders the backup “disappointing” and demanding to know what happened to the front office’s plan to evaluate its future quarterbacks. Orlovsky’s critique highlights a lack of clarity and direction that is now hurting the franchise.

Stefanski’s continued fear of taking a “risk” with Sanders is fast becoming the biggest risk to the Browns’ future.

The Ticking Clock: Credibility and the Trade Market ⏳

The consequence of this organizational stubbornness is mounting with frightening speed.

Fans and analysts are united: If Stefanski continues to stall Sanders’ career, the blame will fall squarely on the organization. The damage would not only hinder his development but also wreck the franchise’s credibility regarding player development and honest competition.

Adding pressure, reports indicate that teams like the Raiders are already showing interest, suggesting a potential trade scenario is looming.

The ball is firmly in Stefanski’s court. He can either embrace the future—and the unanimous support of his star players—by unleashing Shadur Sanders, or he can allow his fear of “risk” to define his tenure and potentially cost the Browns a generational talent. In a season defined by chaos, the coach’s refusal to evolve is now threatening to damage the team beyond immediate repair.