NO MERCY! Ilhan Omar OUSTED as House Republicans & Democrats KICK HER OUT For Past Statements

Chaos in Congress: The Rising Tide to Censure Representative Ilhan Omar

The hallowed halls of the United States House of Representatives are no stranger to heated debate, but the current atmosphere has reached a fever pitch. In an unprecedented wave of legislative maneuvers, a coalition of House Republicans—and even some Democrats—are taking aim at Representative Ilhan Omar (D-MN).

The movement, driven by multiple resolutions, seeks to formally censure Omar and strip her of her seats on key committees, including the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on the Budget. The accusations leveled against her are grave: betrayal of her oath of office, the promotion of foreign interests over American ones, and a pattern of rhetoric that many colleagues deem “disgraceful.”


The Catalyst: The Assassination of Charlie Kirk

The momentum for these resolutions surged following a tragic and polarizing event on September 10, 2025. Charlie Kirk, a prominent conservative figure and founder of Turning Point USA, was assassinated on the campus of Utah Valley University while exercising his First Amendment right to free speech.

The aftermath of this tragedy became a flashpoint in Congress. Representative Nancy Mace (SC) introduced a resolution (House Resolution 713) specifically addressing Omar’s response to the assassination. According to the resolution:

September 11, 2025: Just one day after the murder, Omar allegedly gave an interview on Zeteo’s town hall where she “smeared” Kirk, implying he was to blame for his own death.

September 12, 2025: Omar reposted a video on X (formerly Twitter) that disparaged Kirk’s character and those mourning him, famously stating that the “far right propped his corpse up as a cudgel for their holy war.”

Mace and her supporters argue that such rhetoric is not just insensitive but disqualifying for a member of Congress tasked with representing the American people.


Allegations of “Anti-American” Rhetoric

While the Kirk incident is the most recent spark, Representative Nicole Malliotakis (NY) argues that the issues with Omar run much deeper, particularly regarding her role on the Foreign Affairs Committee.

Malliotakis has been vocal about Omar’s history of equating democratic nations with terrorist organizations. She cited instances where Omar purportedly equated the United States and Israel to groups like Hamas and the Taliban.

“I’ve been in that committee room where the representative equates Israel and the United States to Hamas and the Taliban,” Malliotakis stated. “Absolutely unacceptable for a member of that committee.”

The criticism extends to Omar’s views on global instability. Malliotakis pointed out that Omar has blamed U.S. policy for the economic collapse in Venezuela, rather than the socialist regimes of Hugo Chavez and Nicolás Maduro. Furthermore, New York representatives have specifically taken issue with Omar’s past comments regarding the September 11 terrorist attacks, which she famously described as “some people did something.”


The Question of Loyalty: Somalia vs. The United States

Perhaps the most stinging accusation comes from Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene (GA), who introduced a resolution focused on Omar’s alleged “treasonous tendencies.” This resolution centers on remarks Omar made in Minneapolis on January 27, 2024, regarding her relationship with the Somali government.

According to the resolution, Omar suggested that her role in Congress was to intercede for Somali interests, allegedly telling a crowd:

    The U.S. government will only do what Somalians in the U.S. tell them to do.

    She is in Congress to ensure Somalia’s waters are not “stolen” by Ethiopia.

    Somalians can “sleep in comfort” knowing she is protecting their interests from within the U.S. system.

Greene argued that these statements violate the Oath of Allegiance Omar took upon becoming a citizen and her oath as a member of Congress. The resolution even invoked George Washington’s 1796 Farewell Address, warning against “pretended patriotism” and the influence of foreign interests.


A Call for Consistency and Accountability

A recurring theme among those calling for Omar’s removal is the need for bipartisan accountability. Representative Malliotakis highlighted that she has previously voted to remove members of her own party for inappropriate comments regarding 9/11, emphasizing that the standard must be applied equally to both sides of the aisle.

Committee Targeted
Lead Sponsor
Primary Reason Cited

Education & Workforce
Nancy Mace
Rhetoric following Charlie Kirk’s death

Foreign Affairs
Nicole Malliotakis
Anti-American and Anti-Israel rhetoric

Budget
Marjorie Taylor Greene
Alleged advocacy for Somali interests

The Implications for the House

If these resolutions succeed, Ilhan Omar would be forced to present herself in the “well of the House” for a formal pronouncement of censure—a rare and humiliating public rebuke. Beyond the optics, losing committee assignments significantly diminishes a representative’s power to influence legislation and secure funding for their district.

What Happens Next?

The House is currently in a state of high tension as these resolutions move through the legislative process. With some Democrats reportedly signaling their frustration with Omar’s rhetoric, the vote may not fall strictly along party lines.

As the debate continues, the central question remains: Where is the line between protected political speech and a violation of the congressional oath? For a growing number of House members, that line has been crossed.