“Schiff, Entire Dems Lies Crashes” – Hawley Pulls Out Receipts To Accuse Adam Schiff, Dems of Lying

The Illusion of Competence: Senator Josh Hawley Exposes a Growing Constitutional Crisis

In a political landscape often defined by carefully scripted soundbites and partisan deflection, every so often a moment occurs that pierces through the fog of rhetoric. Last week, Capitol Hill witnessed such a moment. What began as a routine hearing transformed into a blistering exposure of what many are calling a four-year deception of the American public.

At the center of this storm was Senator Josh Hawley, who didn’t just offer opinions—he brought receipts. The focus? A glaring, dangerous contradiction between the public image of President Joe Biden and the internal reality documented by the Department of Justice.

The Great Contradiction: Sharp vs. Unfit

For years, the American people were fed a consistent narrative. From the White House podium to the halls of Congress, the message was clear: Joe Biden was “sharp,” “focused,” “formidable,” and “effective.”

However, Hawley highlighted a devastating contrast. While Democratic colleagues like Senator Ossoff and Vice President Kamala Harris were praising the President’s mental acuity, the Department of Justice’s own Special Counsel, Robert Hur, was reaching a vastly different conclusion. The Hur report famously suggested that Biden could not form the “requisite mental state” to stand trial for the mishandling of classified documents—some of which were found improperly stored in his garage and even a freezer.

“They lied to us for four years. And we know they lied. They know they lied. It’s why they’re not here. They don’t want to answer a single question.” — Senator Josh Hawley

This isn’t just a matter of political “spin.” It represents a fundamental breach of trust. If a leader is deemed too mentally frail to face legal accountability for their actions, how can they be deemed fit to exercise the most powerful office on earth?

The “Autopen” Mystery: Who is Really Signing the Documents?

Perhaps the most technical, yet chilling, part of the hearing involved the use of the Autopen—a device used to mechanically replicate a president’s signature.

Under the Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) guidelines, the Autopen can only be used when the President specifically directs its use for a specific document under his direct authority. During the hearing, Hawley questioned witness Mr. Wolf about the “paper flow” in the Biden White House.

The implications are staggering. If President Biden was mentally unable to give consent or provide direction, who was authorizing the signatures on federal pardons, clemencies for violent offenders, and executive orders?

The Process
The Requirement
The Current Reality

Traditional Practice
A record from the Staff Secretary documenting the President’s personal assent.
No such records have been produced.

Legal Threshold
Direct authority and specific instruction from the President.
Serious questions remain regarding Biden’s mental capacity to provide that direction.

The Risk
Accountability rests with the Commander-in-Chief.
If a “shadow staff” is using the Autopen, it is a constitutional crisis.

Hawley’s point was binary: either there is a record of Joe Biden personally authorizing these signatures, or there isn’t. If the records exist, the White House should release them. If they don’t, the nation is facing an unprecedented executive vacuum.

A Constitutional Crisis in Plain Sight

Hawley didn’t mince words when describing the stakes. He argued that the country has been “walked right into one of the greatest constitutional crises of our history.”

The danger lies in the erosion of accountability. When power becomes “untouchable” and officials hide behind talking points rather than facts, the very foundation of a representative democracy begins to crumble. Hawley pointed out that the “tune changed” only after the world saw the reality during the presidential debates, which he described as a form of “elder abuse” by those who pushed Biden to run again.

The Call for Transparency

The hearing concluded with a direct challenge to the former President and his staff: Release the documents.

If the actions taken over the last four years were legal and constitutional, there should be no hesitation to show the “paper flow” that proves Joe Biden was the one actually making the decisions. Hawley also called on the media to do their job—to stop looking away and start demanding the records that would prove, once and for all, whether the President was truly at the helm.

Why This Matters for Every American

This isn’t about partisan advantage; it’s about the truth. Whether you lean left or right, the idea of an administration operating behind a veil of mental incapacity while staff members potentially exercise executive power via an Autopen should be deeply concerning.

Josh Hawley’s stand was a reminder that:

Words matter: Promises of “transparency” must be backed by actions.

Records matter: The paper trail is the only thing that separates a democracy from a bureaucracy.

Accountability is non-negotiable: No one, regardless of their title, gets a free pass when the Constitution is at stake.

The fight for transparency didn’t end with this hearing. In many ways, it has only just begun. As Hawley noted, the silence from those who once shouted the President’s praises speaks louder than any defense they could offer.

The American people deserve to know who was actually running their country for the last four years. It’s time to see the documents.