Jim Nantz’s Embarassing Blunder Casts Shadow Over Cameron Young’s Historic PGA Triumph

After an agonizing run of seven second-place finishes, Cameron Young finally broke through on Sunday, capturing his first-ever PGA Tour title at the Sedgefield Country Club. The win was more than just a personal triumph; it was billed as a historic milestone, with Young allegedly becoming the 10,000th different player to win on the PGA Tour, according to official tour records.

.

.

.

Young, a Wake Forest graduate, was visibly emotional in his post-round interview. “This is the end of my fourth season. I’ve had chances before, and I wasn’t going to let this one go,” Young declared, making it clear just how much this victory meant to him. He not only pocketed a hefty $1.476 million purse but also secured 500 crucial FedEx Cup points. What made the win even more momentous was its supposed historical link—coming exactly 165 years after Willie Park Sr. won the first-ever British Open in 1860.

However, as the confetti settled and the applause faded, not everyone was convinced by the PGA Tour’s historic claim. On a fiery episode of the Fried Egg Golf podcast, hosts Brendan Porath, Andy Johnson, and BJ discussed the legitimacy of the “10,000th winner” label—a narrative that was also touted heavily by legendary broadcaster Jim Nantz during the final broadcast.

Porath, decked out in celebratory “MR. 10,000” shirts and hats, didn’t hold back. “It’s a house of cards, a complete fabrication,” he charged. “Once I looked into it, I realized this whole story traces back to 1860 with Willie Park Sr. The PGA Tour didn’t even exist then. That’s not a PGA Tour win. It’s just not how it works.”

Porath went on to underscore a crucial historical detail: The PGA was not formally established until 1910, and the first official money list winner, Paul Runyan, wasn’t crowned until 1934. In light of these facts, he and other panelists suggested that the tour’s celebratory milestone was, at best, misleading. “The tour’s stat-keeping is just embarrassing. If that’s the case, why not make a ‘10,000th winner’ shirt for someone back in 1899? It’s not reality—it’s a joke.”

Jim Nantz, who enthusiastically proclaimed the 10,000th winner milestone during Sunday’s broadcast, was quickly called out for perpetuating what critics have called a manufactured storyline. Golf fans flocked to social media to poke fun at Nantz’s on-air gaffe, questioning how such a historic assertion made it through without proper scrutiny. The incident was seen by many as an embarrassing slip from the veteran commentator, whose reputation for reliable, polished coverage took a rare hit.

Despite the debate swirling around the milestone, what cannot be denied is the sheer quality of Young’s play throughout the tournament. Turning professional in 2019, Young was long considered a rising star, but victory had persistently eluded him. Following strong performances at the Genesis Invitational and seven agonizing runner-up finishes, Young finally delivered. His final round of 68, punctuated by a remarkable stretch of five consecutive birdies, cemented his nine-shot lead and tied the Wyndham Championship’s all-time scoring record at 22-under-par, matching marks set by J.T. Poston (2019) and Henrik Stenson (2017).

Sadly, despite this career-defining win, Young finished 85th in the FedEx Cup standings, just missing the playoffs. Yet his perseverance and breakout victory have made him the toast of the golf community.

Even as Young’s impressive achievement remains in the spotlight, the controversy over the PGA Tour’s 10,000th winner claim—and Jim Nantz’s enthusiastic but misguided endorsement—continues to spark heated debate. Is the tour’s milestone a valid celebration of golf’s rich history, or just a convenient marketing ploy?

Let us know your thoughts—has the PGA Tour stretched the truth with its milestone, or does the record still hold up? Sound off in the comments!