Candace Owens CONFRONTED By Joe Rogan Over Charlie Kirk’s Widow

.
.

CONFRONTATION OVER CRIME: Candace Owens Confronted by Joe Rogan Over Charlie Kirk’s Widow

LOS ANGELES, C.A. & YOUTUBE – The ongoing controversy surrounding the assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk has been reignited after political commentator Candace Owens shared highly sensitive, unverified information about the case, including an alleged warning made by Kirk hours before his death.

The revelations, made during her own podcast and discussed on the Joe Rogan Experience, focused on inconsistencies in the official investigation, prompting Rogan to push back on the lack of hard evidence surrounding the case. The debate underscores a growing public and media frustration with the official narrative, which critics argue is riddled with contradictions and cover-ups.

THE CORE REVELATION: KIRK’S FINAL WARNING

Candace Owens dropped a bombshell, sharing information she received privately from individuals close to Charlie Kirk.

The Alleged Premonition: Owens stated that just the day before Charlie Kirk was assassinated, he expressed to close friends that he felt his life was in danger. According to Owens, Kirk told three different people, “I think they’re going to kill me.”
Written Evidence: Even more significantly, Owens revealed that two of these individuals have written communication from Kirk confirming his fear of an impending attack.
The Call to Action: Owens made a public plea to these individuals—who she believes are “good” people—to overcome their fear and break their confidentiality, urging them to come forward and publicly reveal “who is the ‘they’ that he thought were going to kill him.”

Owens admitted she is sharing this information to put pressure on investigators, noting that the official version of the story has “more gaps than Swiss cheese.”

THE FORENSIC CONTRADICTIONS: RIFLE AND TRAJECTORY

The public narrative of the assassination is being dismantled not just by Owens’ claims of a premonition, but by technical and forensic inconsistencies that were amplified by both Owens and Joe Rogan.

1. The Implausible Weapon

The official report claims that the 22-year-old suspect, Tyler Robinson, used an old hunting rifle—reportedly his grandfather’s century-old rifle—to carry out the attack. Rogan and Owens immediately questioned the mechanical plausibility of this claim:

Mechanical Impossibility: Rogan pointed out that the idea of a young, non-military trained individual successfully disassembling and reassembling an antique rifle on a rooftop and then making an accurate, long-distance precision shot “doesn’t make sense mechanically” and is “practically impossible.”
Missing Evidence: Owens revealed that the fragment recovered from Kirk’s neck area does not match the type of projectile that would have been fired from the vintage rifle model the suspect supposedly used. This suggests the actual weapon used has not been publicly identified, severely undermining the core evidence against the suspect.

2. The Decoy Witness

Rogan highlighted a bizarre and previously overlooked detail: a mysterious “decoy witness” who appeared at the scene immediately after the assassination.

The Bizarre Scene: According to witnesses, an older man suddenly appeared, yelling bizarre confessions like “I did it!” and acting erratically, intentionally drawing everyone’s attention away from the real situation.
Suspicious History: Rogan noted that this same mystery man has reportedly been seen at several other major chaotic incidents over the years.
Convenient Silence: The timing became even more suspicious when the man was quickly taken into custody on unrelated charges involving misconduct, making him disappear into the legal system where he can no longer be questioned.

JOE ROGAN’S CHALLENGE: INSTINCT VS. EVIDENCE

The debate between Owens and Rogan highlighted the tension between instinct and evidence, even as Rogan voiced skepticism toward the official narrative.

Rogan’s Pushback: Rogan challenged Owens to be cautious, reminding her that just because something feels suspicious does not mean they should jump to conclusions without irrefutable proof. He stressed the need for reporters to “know when you don’t know what the hell you’re talking about.”
The Media’s Role: The controversy was fueled by the mainstream media’s approach, with outlets like MSNBC floating the bizarre, unverified theory that Kirk was killed by an “accidental shot fired by a supporter in celebration,” a narrative Rogan denounced as “insane” and an attempt to maliciously spin the story.

The consensus among critics is that the pattern of inconsistencies—the premonition, the non-matching projectile, the technically impossible timeline, and the bizarre decoy witness—suggests a calculated effort to “bury the truth under layers of distraction.”

Owens’ decision to go public, despite the risks, forces the public to confront the uncomfortable reality that the official “case closed” narrative might be a carefully constructed façade to hide a deeper, politically motivated conspiracy.

.
play video: